Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26158014›Full record

ReviewNeurophotonics2015

Optrodes for combined optogenetics and electrophysiology in live animals.

Suzie Dufour, Yves De Koninck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurophotonics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Bi-coloured enhanced luminescence imaging by targeted switch on/off laser MEF coupling for synthetic biosensing of nanostructured human serum albumin.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Red Light Optogenetics in Neuroscience.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suzie DufourToronto Western Research Institute , Fundamental Neurobiology, 60 Leonard Avenue, Toronto M5T 2S8, Canada ; University of Toronto , Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, 164 College Street, Toronto M5S 3G9, Canada.
Yves De KoninckInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec , 2601 chemin de la Canardière, Québec G1J 2G3, Canada ; Université Laval , Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 1050 Avenue de la médecine, Québec G1V0A6, Canada ; Université Laval , Centre d'Optique, Photonique et Laser, 2375 rue de la Terrasse, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical tissue properties limit visible light depth penetration in tissue. Because of this, the recent development of optogenetic tools was quickly followed by the development of light delivery devices for in vivo optogenetics applications. We summarize the efforts made in the last decade to design neural probes that combine conventional electrophysiological recordings and optical channel(s) for optogenetic activation, often referred to as optodes or optrodes. Several aspects including challenges for light delivery in living brain tissue, the combination of light delivery with electrophysiological recordings, probe designs, multimodality, wireless implantable system, and practical considerations guiding the choice of configuration depending on the questions one seeks to address are presented.

Indexed as

fiber opticsgenetically-encoded sensorslight-tissue interactionsneuroscienceopsins

Identifiers

PMID26158014
PMCPMC4489589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.