Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26157649›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science

Dynamic behavior of venous collapsibility and central venous pressure during standardized crystalloid bolus: A prospective, observational, pilot study.

Stanislaw P Stawicki, Alistair Kent, Prabhav Patil, Christian Jones, Jill C Stoltzfus, Amar Vira, Nicholas Kelly, Andrew N Springer, Daniel Vazquez, David C Evans and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of inferior vena cava collapsibility and central venous pressure in assessing volume status in shocked patients.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2022
    Article
  3. Advancing clinician-performed sonography in the twenty-first century: building on the rich legacy of the twentieth century pioneers.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stanislaw P StawickiDepartment of Research and Innovation, St Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States.
Alistair KentDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Prabhav PatilDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Christian JonesDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Jill C StoltzfusDepartment of Research and Innovation, St Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States ; The Research Institute, St Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States.
Amar ViraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Nicholas KellyDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Andrew N SpringerDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Daniel VazquezDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
David C EvansDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Thomas J PapadimosDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
David P BahnerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMeasurement of intravascular volume status is an ongoing challenge for physicians in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Most surrogates for volume status, including central venous pressure (CVP) and pulmonary artery wedge pressure, require invasive lines associated with a number of potential complications. Sonographic assessment of the collapsibility of the inferior vena cava (IVC) has been described as a noninvasive method for determining volume status. The purpose of this study was to analyze the dynamic response in IVC collapsibility index (IVC-CI) to changes in CVP in SICU patients receiving fluid boluses for volume resuscitation. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective pilot study was conducted on a sample of SICU patients who met clinical indications for intravenous (IV) fluid bolus and who had preexisting central venous access. Boluses were standardized to crystalloid administration of either 500 mL over 30 min or 1,000 mL over 60 min, as clinically indicated. Concurrent measurements of venous CI (VCI) and CVP were conducted right before initiation of IV bolus (i.e. time 0) and then at 30 and 60 min (as applicable) after bolus initiation. Patient demographics, ventilatory parameters, and vital sign assessments were recorded, with descriptive outcomes reported due to the limited sample size.

resultsTwenty patients received a total of 24 IV fluid boluses. There were five recorded 500 mL boluses given over 30 min and 19 recorded 1,000 mL boluses given over 60 min. Mean (median) CVP measured at 0, 30, and 60 minutes post-bolus were 6.04 ± 3.32 (6.5), 9.00 ± 3.41 (8.0), and 11.1 ± 3.91 (12.0) mmHg, respectively. Mean (median) IVC-CI values at 0, 30, and 60 min were 44.4 ± 25.2 (36.5), 26.5 ± 22.8 (15.6), and 25.2 ± 21.2 (14.8), respectively.

conclusionsObservable changes in both VCI and CVP are apparent during an infusion of a standardized fluid bolus. Dynamic changes in VCI as a measurement of responsiveness to fluid bolus are inversely related to changes seen in CVP. Moreover, an IV bolus tends to produce an early response in VCI, while the CVP response is more gradual. Given the noninvasive nature of the measurement technique, VCI shows promise as a method of dynamically measuring patient response to fluid resuscitation. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Indexed as

Central venous pressureinferior vena cava collapsibility indexintravascular volume status assessmentintravenous fluid bolusPoint-of-care ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID26157649
PMCPMC4477400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.