Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26157556›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules & therapeutics2015

Evaluation of Eye Irritation Potential of Solid Substance with New 3D Reconstructed Human Cornea Model, MCTT HCE(TM).

Won-Hee Jang, Kyoung-Mi Jung, Hye-Ri Yang, Miri Lee, Haeng-Sun Jung, Su-Hyon Lee, Miyoung Park, Kyung-Min Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules & therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmaceutics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Won-Hee JangAmorepacific Corporation R&D Center, Yongin 446-729.
Kyoung-Mi JungAmorepacific Corporation R&D Center, Yongin 446-729.
Hye-Ri YangCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-808.
Miri LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-808.
Haeng-Sun JungModern Cell & Tissue Technologies Inc., Seoul 139-743, Republic of Korea.
Su-Hyon LeeModern Cell & Tissue Technologies Inc., Seoul 139-743, Republic of Korea.
Miyoung ParkAmorepacific Corporation R&D Center, Yongin 446-729.
Kyung-Min LimCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-808.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The eye irritation potential of drug candidates or pharmaceutical ingredients should be evaluated if there is a possibility of ocular exposure. Traditionally, the ocular irritation has been evaluated by the rabbit Draize test. However, rabbit eyes are more sensitive to irritants than human eyes, therefore substantial level of false positives are unavoidable. To resolve this species difference, several three-dimensional human corneal epithelial (HCE) models have been developed as alternative eye irritation test methods. Recently, we introduced a new HCE model, MCTT HCE(TM) which is reconstructed with non-transformed human corneal cells from limbal tissues. Here, we examined if MCTT HCE(TM) can be employed to evaluate eye irritation potential of solid substances. Through optimization of washing method and exposure time, treatment time was established as 10 min and washing procedure was set up as 4 times of washing with 10 mL of PBS and shaking in 30 mL of PBS in a beaker. With the established eye irritation test protocol, 11 solid substances (5 non-irritants, 6 irritants) were evaluated which demonstrated an excellent predictive capacity (100% accuracy, 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity). We also compared the performance of our test method with rabbit Draize test results and in vitro cytotoxicity test with 2D human corneal epithelial cell lines.

Indexed as

Eye irritationMCTT HCETM modelProtocol refinementReconstructed cornea model

Identifiers

PMID26157556
PMCPMC4489834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.