ArticleAmerican health & drug benefits2015
Estimating the Costs of Therapy in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Model Framework.
Article in American health & drug benefits, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Economic Evaluation of Talimogene Laherparepvec Plus Ipilimumab Combination Therapy vs Ipilimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Unresectable Melanoma.JAMA dermatology · 2019Trial
- Review
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination therapies involving novel agents for first/second-relapse patients with multiple myeloma: a Markov model approach with calibration techniques.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Economic Impact of Elranatamab for Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2025Article
- Comorbidities and survival of multiple myeloma patients diagnosed in Finland between 2000 and 2021.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- An overview of multiple myeloma: A monoclonal plasma cell malignancy's diagnosis, management, and treatment modalities.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2024Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of 7 treatments in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a public-payer perspective.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Budget Impact Analysis of Idecabtagene Vicleucel for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the US.Clinical drug investigation · 2022Article
- A prospective, randomized trial of patient-reported outcome measures to drive management decisions in hematology and oncology.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- Association of High-Deductible Health Plan Enrollment With Spending on and Use of Lenalidomide Therapy Among Commercially Insured Patients With Multiple Myeloma.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2022Article
- A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Novel Agents in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.Cancers · 2021Review
- Phase-Specific and Lifetime Costs of Multiple Myeloma Among Older Adults in the US.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Cost-effectiveness of Novel Treatment Sequences for Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma.JAMA network open · 2021Observational
- Budget Impact of Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf) Adoption in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the United States.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2021Article
- A U.S. Cost Analysis of Triplet Regimens for Patients with Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2019Article
- Delay treatment of AL amyloidosis at relapse until symptomatic: devil is in the details.Blood advances · 2019Review
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness of Drugs to Treat Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultiple myeloma is a progressive cancer for which there is no cure. Despite treatment, almost all patients eventually experience periods of disease relapse and remission. With the increasing use of novel therapies, including bortezomib, lenalidomide, carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and panobinostat, benchmarks for assessing the value of these therapies in treating patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are needed for physicians and payers alike.
objectivesTo develop a model framework and to calculate an annual estimate of the total costs per patient for the treatment of patients with RRMM using 7 common treatment regimens, including bortezomib plus dexamethasone; panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; lenalidomide plus dexamethasone; lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; carfilzomib; carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone; and pomalidomide plus dexamethasone.
methodsThe expenditures for drugs and their administration, for prophylaxis and adverse event monitoring, and for the treatment of grade 3 or 4 adverse events were included in the calculations of the total pharmacy and medical costs. The drug costs were based on published pricing and labeled dosing schedules; the adverse event prophylaxis and monitoring costs were obtained from peer-reviewed publications; and the adverse event incidence rates were obtained from each regimen's prescribing information and from clinical trials. All the costs were summed over the duration of therapy for which the drugs were administered and were calculated separately for commercial and Medicare plans. The duration of therapy for each regimen was the time for which a patient had to be receiving the regimen to obtain 12 months of progression-free survival based on the duration-of-therapy to progression-free survival ratio observed from published clinical trials and/or the drug's labeling.
resultsThe pharmacy costs were highest for pomalidomide plus dexamethasone, whereas the medical costs were highest for the combination of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. The total cost associated with available treatments for RRMM was highest for regimens that included lenalidomide (approximate range, $126,000-$256,000). Only bortezomib plus dexamethasone and the combination of panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone had total costs that were lower than $125,000 per patient.
conclusionThis study represents the first model developed to comprehensively estimate the costs of managing RRMM with all currently approved and guideline-recommended regimens in the United States. As such, it provides the framework and basis for further budget impact analyses and for cost-effectiveness comparisons with these regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26157542PMC4489189What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.