Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26157448›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Flower abscission in Vitis vinifera L. triggered by gibberellic acid and shade discloses differences in the underlying metabolic pathways.

Sara Domingos, Pietro Scafidi, Vania Cardoso, Antonio E Leitao, Rosario Di Lorenzo, Cristina M Oliveira, Luis F Goulao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Phenotypic, Hormonal, and Genomic Variation AmongFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara DomingosLinking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon, Portugal ; Agri4Safe-BioTrop, Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical I.P., Lisbon Portugal.
Pietro ScafidiDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, University of Palermo Palermo, Italy.
Vania CardosoAgri4Safe-BioTrop, Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical I.P., Lisbon Portugal.
Antonio E LeitaoAgri4Safe-BioTrop, Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical I.P., Lisbon Portugal.
Rosario Di LorenzoDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, University of Palermo Palermo, Italy.
Cristina M OliveiraLinking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon, Portugal.
Luis F GoulaoAgri4Safe-BioTrop, Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical I.P., Lisbon Portugal.
Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding abscission is both a biological and an agronomic challenge. Flower abscission induced independently by shade and gibberellic acid (GAc) sprays was monitored in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) growing under a soilless greenhouse system during two seasonal growing conditions, in an early and late production cycle. Physiological and metabolic changes triggered by each of the two distinct stimuli were determined. Environmental conditions exerted a significant effect on fruit set as showed by the higher natural drop rate recorded in the late production cycle with respect to the early cycle. Shade and GAc treatments increased the percentage of flower drop compared to the control, and at a similar degree, during the late production cycle. The reduction of leaf gas exchanges under shade conditions was not observed in GAc treated vines. The metabolic profile assessed in samples collected during the late cycle differently affected primary and secondary metabolisms and showed that most of the treatment-resulting variations occurred in opposite trends in inflorescences unbalanced in either hormonal or energy deficit abscission-inducing signals. Particularly concerning carbohydrates metabolism, sucrose, glucose, tricarboxylic acid metabolites and intermediates of the raffinose family oligosaccharides pathway were lower in shaded and higher in GAc samples. Altered oxidative stress remediation mechanisms and indolacetic acid (IAA) concentration were identified as abscission signatures common to both stimuli. According to the global analysis performed, we report that grape flower abscission mechanisms triggered by GAc application and C-starvation are not based on the same metabolic pathways.

Indexed as

abscissiongibberellic acidgrapevineinflorescencemetabolomicsshadethinning

Identifiers

PMID26157448
PMCPMC4476107
OpenAlexW1515598044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.