Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26157398›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2015

New perspectives for motivating better decisions in older adults.

JoNell Strough, Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Ellen Peters

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05691790 (Empowering Older People's Preventive Care Utilization Through Mental Model Approach and Patient Activation Approach), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05691790 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Empowering Older People's Preventive Care Utilization Through Mental Model Approach and Patient Activation Approach: a Randomized Control Trial for Promoting Vaccination Uptake

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2024 to 2025Enrolled270ConditionsHealth CommunicationArmsMMA and patient activation intervention scheme, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of a Novel Hospice-Specific Patient Decision Aid.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024
    Trial
  3. Perceived Social Norms Guide Health Care Decisions for Oneself and Others: A Cross-Sectional Experiment in a US Online Panel.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Susceptibility to default effects does not differ by age.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2023
    Article
  9. Purpose in Life and Cognition Interact to Impact Healthcare and Financial Decision Making in Old Age.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022
    Article
  10. The Association of Late Life Cognitive Activity with Healthcare and Financial Decision-Making in Community-Dwelling, Nondemented Older Adults.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Age-Related Differences in Motivational Integration and Cognitive Control.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

JoNell StroughDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University , Morgantown, WV, USA.
Wändi Bruine de BruinCentre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK ; Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ellen PetersDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

Measurement of International Differences in Well-BeingR01AG040716 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KAPTEYN, ARIE · 2011 to 2015
$1000k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision-making competence in later adulthood is affected by declines in cognitive skills, and age-related changes in affect and experience can sometimes compensate. However, recent findings suggest that age-related changes in motivation also affect the extent to which adults draw from experience, affect, and deliberative skills when making decisions. To date, relatively little attention has been given to strategies for addressing age-related changes in motivation to promote better decisions in older adults. To address this limitation, we draw from diverse literatures to suggest promising intervention strategies for motivating older recipients' motivation to make better decisions. We start by reviewing the life-span developmental literature, which suggests that older adults' motivation to put effort into decisions depends on the perceived personal relevance of decisions as well as their self-efficacy (i.e., confidence in applying their ability and knowledge). Next, we discuss two approaches from the health intervention design literature, the mental models approach and the patient activation approach, which aim to improve motivation for decision making by improving personal relevance or by building self-efficacy or confidence to use new information and skills. Using examples from these literatures, we discuss how to construct interventions to motivate good decisions in later adulthood.

Indexed as

agingcognitiondecision makingemotionsinterventionsmental modelsmotivationself efflicacy

Identifiers

PMID26157398
PMCPMC4475788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.