Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26157326›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2015

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation analysis in cytological specimens and responsiveness to gefitinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Lin Li, Zijin Zhang, Zhixin Bie, Zheng Wang, Ping Zhang, Xin Nie, Yuanming Li, Hui Wang, Bin Ai, Gang Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prognostic analysis of patients with mutant and wild-typeCancer management and research · 2019
    Article
  2. UncommonChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2017
    Article
  3. Survival difference betweenChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lin Li1 Department of Oncology, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Zijin Zhang1 Department of Oncology, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Zhixin Bie1 Department of Oncology, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Zheng Wang1 Department of Oncology, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Ping Zhang1 Department of Oncology, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Xin Nie1 Department of Oncology, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Yuanming Li1 Department of Oncology, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Hui Wang1 Department of Oncology, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Bin Ai1 Department of Oncology, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Gang Cheng1 Department of Oncology, 2 Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is the key predictor of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted this study to verify the feasibility of EGFR mutation analysis in cytological specimens and investigate the responsiveness to gefitinib treatment in patients carrying EGFR mutations.

methodsA total of 210 cytological specimens were collected for EGFR mutation detection by both direct sequencing and amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). We analyzed EGFR mutation status by both methods and evaluated the responsiveness to gefitinib treatment in patients harboring EGFR mutations by overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and progression free survival (PFS).

resultsOf all patients, EGFR mutation rate was 28.6% (60/210) by direct sequencing and 45.2% (95/210) by ARMS (P<0.001) respectively. Among the EGFR wild type patients tested by direct sequencing, 26.7% of them were positive by ARMS. For the 72 EGFR mutation positive patients treated with gefitinib, the ORR, DCR and median PFS were 69.4%, 90.2% and 9.3 months respectively. The patients whose EGFR mutation status was negative by direct sequencing but positive by ARMS had lower ORR (48.0% vs. 80.9%, P=0.004) and shorter median PFS (7.4 vs. 10.5 months, P=0.009) as compared with that of EGFR mutation positive patients by both detection methods.

conclusionsOur study verified the feasibility of EGFR analysis in cytological specimens in advanced NSCLC. ARMS is more sensitive than direct sequencing in EGFR mutation detection. EGFR Mutation status tested on cytological samples is applicable for predicting the response to gefitinib. Abundance of EGFR mutations might have an influence on TKIs efficacy.

Indexed as

amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)cytological specimenepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutationgefitinibNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Identifiers

PMID26157326
PMCPMC4490197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.