Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26157282›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology

Indian Council of Medical Research consensus document for the management of gall bladder cancer.

Hari Shankar Shukla, Bhawna Sirohi, Anu Behari, Atul Sharma, Jahar Majumdar, Manomoy Ganguly, Mallika Tewari, Sandeep Kumar, Sunil Saini, Peush Sahni and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Early Diagnosis of Gall Bladder Cancer: An Appeal.South Asian journal of cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. How I Manage My Patients with Gall Bladder Cancer?Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Gallbladder cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Hari Shankar ShuklaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Bhawna SirohiMazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre, Narayana Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Anu BehariDepartment of GI Surgery, SGPGI, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Atul SharmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Jahar MajumdarDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Manomoy GangulyDepartment of Surgery, Army Hospital, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Mallika TewariDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Sandeep KumarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Saket Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sunil SainiHIMS, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Peush SahniDepartment of GI Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Tomcha SinghDepartment of Radiotherapy, RIMS, Imphal, Manipur, India.
Vinay Kumar KapoorDepartment of GI Surgery, SGPGI, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
V SucharitaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Tanvir KaurIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Deepak Kumar ShuklaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Goura Kishor RathDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The document is based on consensus among the experts and best available evidence pertaining to Indian population and is meant for practice in India.All postcholecystectomy gallbladder specimens should be opened and examined carefully by the operating surgeon and be sent for histopathological examination.All "incidental" gall bladder cancers (GBCs) picked up on histopathological examination should have an expert opinion.Evaluation of a patient with early GBC should include essential tests: A computed tomography (CT) scan (multi-detector or helical) of the abdomen and pelvis for staging with a CT chest or chest X-ray, and complete blood counts, renal and liver function tests. magnetic resonance imaging/positron emission tomography (PET)-CT are not recommended for all patients.For early stage disease (up to Stage IVA), surgery is recommended. The need for adjuvant treatment would be guided by the histopathological analysis of the resected specimen.Patients with Stage IVB/metastatic disease must be assessed for palliative e.g. endoscopic or radiological intervention, chemotherapy versus best supportive care on an individual basis. These patients do not require extensive workup outside of a clinical trial setting.There is an urgent need for multicenter trials from India covering various aspects of epidemiology (viz., identification of population at high-risk, organized follow-up), clinical management (viz., bile spill during surgery, excision of all port sites, adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy) and basic research (viz., what causes GBC).

Indexed as

Gall bladder cancerguidelinesICMRtreatmemt

Identifiers

PMID26157282
PMCPMC4477381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.