Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26157275›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2015

Upper limb function evaluation scales for individuals with cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

Cibele Almeida Santos, Renata Calhes Franco de Moura, Roberta Delasta Lazzari, Arislander Jonathan Lopes Dumont, Luiz Alfredo Ferreira Braun, Claudia Santos Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cibele Almeida SantosMovement Analysis Lab, University Nove/UNINOVE, Brazil.
Renata Calhes Franco de MouraMovement Analysis Lab, University Nove/UNINOVE, Brazil.
Roberta Delasta LazzariMovement Analysis Lab, University Nove/UNINOVE, Brazil.
Arislander Jonathan Lopes DumontMovement Analysis Lab, University Nove/UNINOVE, Brazil.
Luiz Alfredo Ferreira BraunMovement Analysis Lab, University Nove/UNINOVE, Brazil.
Claudia Santos OliveiraMovement Analysis Lab, University Nove/UNINOVE, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the scales and methods most often used for the evaluation of upper limb function in individuals with cerebral palsy. [Materials and Methods] Searches were conducted in the Medline, PEDro, Lilacs, Scielo, and PubMed databases. The following inclusion criteria were used for the selection of articles: randomized controlled study, evaluation of upper limb function in individuals with cerebral palsy, and publication between 2006 and 2014. The methodological quality of the articles was evaluated using the PEDro evidence scale. [Results] Five articles met the inclusion criteria and achieved 6 points or higher on the PEDro scale of methodological quality. [Conclusion] The studies analyzed used different evaluation scales, but no consensus has been reached thus far on which scale is the most appropriate. Thus, further studies are needed to establish an adequate method for the evaluation of upper limb function in individuals with cerebral palsy.

Indexed as

Cerebral palsyScale functionUpper limbs

Identifiers

PMID26157275
PMCPMC4483453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.