Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26157183›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy

Application of the Beers Criteria to Alternate Level of Care Patients in Hospital Inpatient Units.

Heather Slaney, Stacey MacAulay, Janice Irvine-Meek, Joshua Murray

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Alternate Level of Care Patients in Canada: a Scoping Review.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Protecting Our Elderly Patients from Adverse Drug Reactions.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy
    Article
  9. [Not Available].The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Heather SlaneyBScPharm, ACPR, was, at the time this study was conducted, a Pharmacy Resident at The Moncton Hospital, Moncton, New Brunswick. She is now a Clinical Pharmacist at the Janeway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre, Eastern Health, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador.
Stacey MacAulayBScPharm, PharmD, is Residency Coordinator and Pharmacy Clinical Practice Leader (Ambulatory Care), Horizon Health Network, The Moncton Hospital, Moncton, New Brunswick, and Adjunct Professor, College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Janice Irvine-Meek, BSc(Pharm), PharmD, FCSHP, RPh, was, at the time this study was conducted, Clinical Manager and Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Geriatrics, The Moncton Hospital, Moncton, New Brunswick.
Joshua MurrayMSc, is a Biostatistician with the Health Research Unit, Horizon NB, Horizon Health Network, The Moncton Hospital, Moncton, New Brunswick.
Moncton Hospital · CAHorizon Health Network · CAJaneway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Beers criteria were developed to help in identifying potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for elderly patients. These medications are often associated with adverse events and limited effectiveness in older adults. Patients awaiting an alternate level of care (ALC patients) are those who no longer require acute care hospital services and are waiting for placement elsewhere. They are often elderly, have complex medication regimens, and are at high risk of adverse events. At the time of this study no studies had applied the Beers criteria to ALC patients in Canadian hospitals.

objectivesTo determine the proportion of ALC patients receiving PIMs and the proportion experiencing selected PIM-related adverse events.

methodsA retrospective chart review of ALC patients 65 years of age or older was performed to identify PIMs and the occurrence of selected adverse events (specifically central nervous system [CNS] events, falls, bradycardia, hypoglycemia, seizures, insomnia, gastrointestinal bleeding, and urinary tract infections). A logistic regression model with a random intercept for each patient was constructed to estimate odds ratios and probabilities of adverse events.

resultsFifty-two ALC patients were included in the study. Of these, 48 (92%) were taking a PIM. Of the 922 adverse events evaluated, 407 (44.1%) were associated with a regularly scheduled PIM. Among patients who were taking regularly scheduled PIMs, there was a significantly increased probability of an adverse CNS event and of a fall (p < 0.001 for both). The most common PIM medication classes were first-generation antihistamines (24 [46%] of the 52 patients), antipsychotics (21 patients [40%]), short-acting benzodiazepines (15 patients [29%]), and nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics (14 patients [27%]).

conclusionsA high proportion of ALC patients were taking PIMs and experienced an adverse event that may have been related to these drugs. These findings suggest that the ALC population might benefit from regular medication review and monitoring to prevent or detect adverse events.

Indexed as

adverse eventsalternate level of careBeers criteriaCanadretrospective

Identifiers

PMID26157183
PMCPMC4485509
OpenAlexW1579530153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.