Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26157055›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2015

Sugar-induced cephalic-phase insulin release is mediated by a T1r2+T1r3-independent taste transduction pathway in mice.

John I Glendinning, Sarah Stano, Marlena Holter, Tali Azenkot, Olivia Goldman, Robert F Margolskee, Joseph R Vasselli, Anthony Sclafani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Noncanonical Taste Transduction of Sugars Elicits Responses in a Dedicated Subset of Gustatory Afferent Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanisms and Functions of Sweet Reception in Oral and Extraoral Organs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Protein Extract of a Probiotic Strain ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

John I GlendinningDepartment of Biology, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, New York; jglendin@barnard.edu.
Sarah StanoDepartment of Biology, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, New York;
Marlena HolterDepartment of Biology, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, New York;
Tali AzenkotDepartment of Biology, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, New York;
Olivia GoldmanDepartment of Biology, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, New York;
Robert F MargolskeeMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;
Joseph R VasselliObesity Research Center, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York; and.
Anthony SclafaniDepartment of Psychology, Brooklyn College of City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York.
Columbia University · USBarnard College · USCity University of New York · USMonell Chemical Senses Center · US

Funding

Pathways and genes of sweet taste cellsR01DC014105 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI MARGOLSKEE, ROBERT F. · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory stimulation from foods elicits cephalic phase responses, which facilitate digestion and nutrient assimilation. One such response, cephalic-phase insulin release (CPIR), enhances glucose tolerance. Little is known about the chemosensory mechanisms that activate CPIR. We studied the contribution of the sweet taste receptor (T1r2+T1r3) to sugar-induced CPIR in C57BL/6 (B6) and T1r3 knockout (KO) mice. First, we measured insulin release and glucose tolerance following oral (i.e., normal ingestion) or intragastric (IG) administration of 2.8 M glucose. Both groups of mice exhibited a CPIR following oral but not IG administration, and this CPIR improved glucose tolerance. Second, we examined the specificity of CPIR. Both mouse groups exhibited a CPIR following oral administration of 1 M glucose and 1 M sucrose but not 1 M fructose or water alone. Third, we studied behavioral attraction to the same three sugar solutions in short-term acceptability tests. B6 mice licked more avidly for the sugar solutions than for water, whereas T1r3 KO mice licked no more for the sugar solutions than for water. Finally, we examined chorda tympani (CT) nerve responses to each of the sugars. Both mouse groups exhibited CT nerve responses to the sugars, although those of B6 mice were stronger. We propose that mice possess two taste transduction pathways for sugars. One mediates behavioral attraction to sugars and requires an intact T1r2+T1r3. The other mediates CPIR but does not require an intact T1r2+T1r3. If the latter taste transduction pathway exists in humans, it should provide opportunities for the development of new treatments for controlling blood sugar.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBlood GlucoseCarbohydratesChorda Tympani NerveFood PreferencesFructoseGenotypeGlucoseGlucose Tolerance TestInjectionsInsulinMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPhenotypeBlood GlucoseCarbohydratesFructoseGlucoseInsulinReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSucroseSweetening Agentstaste receptors, type 1cephalic-phase insulin releaseglucose tolerancemicesweet tasteT1r3

Identifiers

PMID26157055
PMCPMC4591378
OpenAlexW2126643384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.