Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26157041›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2016

A Process Evaluation of the Alaska Native Colorectal Cancer Family Outreach Program.

Diana Redwood, Ellen Provost, Ellen D S Lopez, Monica Skewes, Rhonda Johnson, Claudia Christensen, Frank Sacco, Donald Haverkamp

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation and impact of Indigenous health interventions: A systematic review of qualitative studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Growing Disparity in the Incidence of Colorectal Cancer among Non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native Populations-United States, 2013-2017.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Diana RedwoodAlaska Native Epidemiology Center, Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, AK, USA dredwood@anthc.org.
Ellen ProvostAlaska Native Epidemiology Center, Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Ellen D S LopezUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks, AK, USA.
Monica SkewesMontana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Rhonda JohnsonUniversity of Alaska Anchorage, AK, USA.
Claudia ChristensenAlaska Native Epidemiology Center, Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Frank SaccoAlaska Native Epidemiology Center, Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Donald HaverkampDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USMontana State University · USUniversity of Alaska Anchorage · USUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents the results of a process evaluation of the Alaska Native (AN) Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Family Outreach Program, which encourages CRC screening among AN first-degree relatives (i.e., parents, siblings, adult children; hereafter referred to as relatives) of CRC patients. Among AN people incidence and death rates from CRC are the highest of any ethnic/racial group in the United States. Relatives of CRC patients are at increased risk; however, CRC can be prevented and detected early through screening. The evaluation included key informant interviews (August to November 2012) with AN and non-AN stakeholders and program document review. Five key process evaluation components were identified: program formation, evolution, outreach responses, strengths, and barriers and challenges. Key themes included an incremental approach that led to a fully formed program and the need for dedicated, culturally competent patient navigation. Challenges included differing relatives' responses to screening outreach, health system data access and coordination, and the program impact of reliance on grant funding. This program evaluation indicated a need for more research into motivating patient screening behaviors, electronic medical records systems quality improvement projects, improved data-sharing protocols, and program sustainability planning to continue the dedicated efforts to promote screening in this increased risk population.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousInuitAdultAlaskaColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFamilyHumansMass ScreeningMinority GroupsPatient NavigationProgram EvaluationAlaska Native peoplecolorectal cancer preventioncolorectal cancer screeningdata-sharing protocolsfamily historypatient navigatorsprogram sustainability

Identifiers

PMID26157041
PMCPMC4706499
OpenAlexW845797791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.