Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26156984›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Dopaminergic Modulation of Decision Making and Subjective Well-Being.

Robb B Rutledge, Nikolina Skandali, Peter Dayan, Raymond J Dolan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05065151 (Understanding Motivation in Parkinson's Patients Through Neurophysiology), which is not on this map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05065151 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Understanding Motivation in Parkinson's Patients Through Neurophysiology

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2021 to 2030Enrolled70ConditionsParkinson Disease, Deep Brain Stimulation, MotivationArmsStimulation on, Stimulation off, Decision Making Task
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Dopamine Receptor-Specific Contributions to the Computation of Value.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Dopamine Increases a Value-Independent Gambling Propensity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Sense of agency and decision making.Frontiers in psychology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robb B RutledgeWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom, Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom, and robb.rutledge@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7337-5039
Nikolina SkandaliWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2024-2256
Peter DayanGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3476-1839
Raymond J DolanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom, Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom, and.
University College London · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 078865/Z/05/ZWellcome Trust 091593Wellcome Trust 091593/Z/10/ZWellcome Trust 095844Wellcome Trust 098362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neuromodulator dopamine has a well established role in reporting appetitive prediction errors that are widely considered in terms of learning. However, across a wide variety of contexts, both phasic and tonic aspects of dopamine are likely to exert more immediate effects that have been less well characterized. Of particular interest is dopamine's influence on economic risk taking and on subjective well-being, a quantity known to be substantially affected by prediction errors resulting from the outcomes of risky choices. By boosting dopamine levels using levodopa (l-DOPA) as human subjects made economic decisions and repeatedly reported their momentary happiness, we show here an effect on both choices and happiness. Boosting dopamine levels increased the number of risky options chosen in trials involving potential gains but not trials involving potential losses. This effect could be better captured as increased Pavlovian approach in an approach-avoidance decision model than as a change in risk preferences within an established prospect theory model. Boosting dopamine also increased happiness resulting from some rewards. Our findings thus identify specific novel influences of dopamine on decision making and emotion that are distinct from its established role in learning.

Indexed as

RewardAdultAvoidance LearningDecision MakingDopamineDopamine AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGames, ExperimentalHappinessHumansLevodopaMaleStatistics, NonparametricSurveys and QuestionnairesDopamineDopamine AgentsLevodopadecision makingdopaminereward prediction errorsubjective well-being

Identifiers

PMID26156984
PMCPMC4495239
OpenAlexW2105920916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.