Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26156958›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2015

Consumer Sleep Technologies: A Review of the Landscape.

Ping-Ru T Ko, Julie A Kientz, Eun Kyoung Choe, Matthew Kay, Carol A Landis, Nathaniel F Watson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 216 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Digital Health and Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Effect of wearables on sleep in healthy individuals: a randomized crossover trial and validation study.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A narrative review on in-flight use of consumer sleep technologies for aviation research.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ping-Ru T KoDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Julie A KientzHuman Centered Design & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Eun Kyoung ChoeCollege of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
Matthew KayComputer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Carol A LandisBiobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Nathaniel F WatsonDepartment of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
University of Washington · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review sleep related consumer technologies, including mobile electronic device "apps," wearable devices, and other technologies. Validation and methodological transparency, the effect on clinical sleep medicine, and various social, legal, and ethical issues are discussed.

methodsWe reviewed publications from the digital libraries of the Association for Computing Machinery, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and PubMed; publications from consumer technology websites; and mobile device app marketplaces. Search terms included "sleep technology," "sleep app," and "sleep monitoring."

resultsConsumer sleep technologies are categorized by delivery platform including mobile device apps (integrated with a mobile operating system and utilizing mobile device functions such as the camera or microphone), wearable devices (on the body or attached to clothing), embedded devices (integrated into furniture or other fixtures in the native sleep environment), accessory appliances, and conventional desktop/website resources. Their primary goals include facilitation of sleep induction or wakening, self-guided sleep assessment, entertainment, social connection, information sharing, and sleep education.

conclusionsConsumer sleep technologies are changing the landscape of sleep health and clinical sleep medicine. These technologies have the potential to both improve and impair collective and individual sleep health depending on method of implementation.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSleepAccelerometryActigraphyHumansMonitoring, AmbulatoryReproducibility of ResultsSleep Wake DisordersSmartphonebiomedical technologyeducational technologysleepsleep disorders

Identifiers

PMID26156958
PMCPMC4661339
OpenAlexW2475019993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.