Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26156901›Full record

Trial reportGlobal journal of health science2015

Comparison of Quetiapine and Risperidone in Treatment of Acute Psychosis: A Double-Blind, Randomized-Controlled Study.

S Mohamad Moosavi, Mahshid Ahmadi, Dianoosh Mojtahedi, Jamshid Yazdani, Mani B Monajemi

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Global journal of health science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Treating Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: an Update.Current treatment options in psychiatry
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S Mohamad MoosaviMazandaran University of Medical Sciences. smhdmoosavi@yahoo.com.
Mahshid Ahmadi
Dianoosh Mojtahedi
Jamshid Yazdani
Mani B Monajemi
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Quetiapine versus Risperidone in control of acute psychotic signs and symptoms in hospitalized patients during four weeks.

methodsIn this double-blind, randomized controlled study, a total of 90 patients with a confirmed diagnosis acute psychosis and were hospitalized in Zare Hospital, Sari, Iran, and they were treated with Quetiapine (mean 500 mg/day) or Risperidone (mean 5.2 mg/day), in a 4 week period. The positive and negative symptoms scale (PANSS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-s) were used to assess psychotic symptoms and severity of illness in first and the last day of the study.

resultsNo significant difference found between two groups in decreasing positive and negative sub-scores in the PANSS. Risperidone was superior to Quetiapine in decreasing the PANSS general psychopathology sub-scores and total score (p<0.05). No significant difference found between two groups in decreasing CGI-s score.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAntipsychotic AgentsDibenzothiazepinesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychotic DisordersQuetiapine FumarateRisperidoneSeverity of Illness IndexYoung AdultAntipsychotic AgentsDibenzothiazepinesQuetiapine FumarateRisperidone

Identifiers

PMID26156901
PMCPMC4803846
OpenAlexW1497716048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.