Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26156627›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2015

Lung inflammation and lack of genotoxicity in the comet and micronucleus assays of industrial multiwalled carbon nanotubes Graphistrength(©) C100 after a 90-day nose-only inhalation exposure of rats.

Daniela Pothmann, Sophie Simar, Detlef Schuler, Eva Dony, Stéphane Gaering, Jean-Loïc Le Net, Yoshi Okazaki, Jean Michel Chabagno, Cécile Bessibes, Julien Beausoleil and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Adverse effects of nanoparticles on humans.Journal of occupational health · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review of toxicity studies of carbon nanotubes.Journal of occupational health · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela PothmannHarlan Laboratories Ltd, Zelgliweg 1, 4452, Itingen, Switzerland. Daniela.pothmann@gmx.de.
Sophie SimarLaboratoire de Toxicologie Génétique, Institut Pasteur de Lille, 1 rue du Pr. Calmette, 59019, Lille, Cedex, France. sophie.simar@pasteur-lille.fr.
Detlef SchulerHarlan Laboratories Ltd, Zelgliweg 1, 4452, Itingen, Switzerland. schuler@s-t-c.eu.
Eva DonyHarlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH, In den Leppsteinwiesen 19, 64380, Rossdorf, Germany. edony@harlan.com.
Stéphane GaeringHarlan Laboratories Ltd, Zelgliweg 1, 4452, Itingen, Switzerland. sgaering@harlan.com.
Jean-Loïc Le NetLe Net Pathology Consulting, 18 rue Henry Dunant, 37400, Amboise, France. lenet@lenetpathologyconsulting.com.
Yoshi OkazakiAnaPath GmbH, Buchsweg 56, 4625, Oberbuchsiten, Switzerland. okazaki5374625@bluewin.ch.
Jean Michel ChabagnoArkema France, Groupement de Recherches de Lacq (GRL), Laboratoires d'analyse de surface et microscopie et de chimie analytique, 64170, Lacq, France. jean-michel.chabagno@arkema.com.
Cécile BessibesArkema France, Groupement de Recherches de Lacq (GRL), Laboratoires d'analyse de surface et microscopie et de chimie analytique, 64170, Lacq, France. cecile.bessibes@arkema.com.
Julien BeausoleilArkema France, Groupement de Recherches de Lacq (GRL), Laboratoires d'analyse de surface et microscopie et de chimie analytique, 64170, Lacq, France. julien.beausoleil@arkema.com.
Fabrice NesslanyLaboratoire de Toxicologie Génétique, Institut Pasteur de Lille, 1 rue du Pr. Calmette, 59019, Lille, Cedex, France. fabrice.nesslany@pasteur-lille.fr.
Jean-François RégnierArkema France, Département Toxicologie et Environnement, 420 rue d' Estienne d' Orves, 92705, Colombes, France. jean-francois.regnier@arkema.com.
Arkema (France) · FRInstitut Pasteur de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGraphistrength (©) C100 multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) provide superior electrical and mechanical properties for various applications. The evaluation of the intrinsic hazard properties of Graphistrength(©) C100 is an essential step for safe use. A general feature of multiwalled carbon nanotubes after inhalation or intratracheal exposures is the induction of an inflammatory reaction in the lungs sometimes associated with local genotoxic effects.

methodsAfter investigating different parameters for the aerosol generation and performing a 5-day inhalation range finding study, male and female Wistar rats were exposed nose-only for 90 days to target concentrations of 0.05, 0.25 and 5.0 mg/m(3) air of Graphistrength (©) C100 and sacrificed 24 h and 90 days after the last exposure. Broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was also collected and analyzed for inflammatory parameters. Twenty-four hours post-exposure, chromosomal aberrations in the bone marrow cells were evaluated by the micronucleus test and DNA damages in the lung, kidney and liver cells by both the standard and the human 8-oxoguanine DNA N-glycosylase 1 (hOGG1)-modified comet assay. All studies were performed according to the OECD test guidelines.

resultsAn inflammatory lung reaction and the release of inflammatory factors in the BALF were observed in all rats exposed to 5.0 mg/m(3), associated with changes in the differential white blood cells counts. The slight changes in BALF parameters at 0.25 mg/m(3) recovered and signs of lung clearance of the MWCNT were observed. No pathological changes were observed on the pleura. Neither increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes nor increase in percent DNA damage were observed at any concentration.

conclusionsLung inflammation characteristic of an overload with insoluble particles was observed after a 90-day exposure to 5.0 mg/m(3) of Graphistrength (©) C100. Clear signs of clearance and recovery were observed at 0.25 mg/m(3). No genotoxicity was detected locally in lung and distally in bone marrow, liver and kidney. Therefore, Graphistrength (©) C100 appears of low concern in term of local and systemic genotoxicity and a No-Observed Adverse Effect Concentration (NOAEC) of 0.25 mg/m(3) (0.28 mg/m(3) as actual concentration) was established for the repeated-dose toxicity.

Indexed as

Comet AssayMicronucleus TestsAerosolsAnimalsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidDNA DamageDNA GlycosylasesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleInflammation MediatorsInhalation ExposureLungMaleMicronuclei, Chromosome-DefectiveNanotubes, CarbonNo-Observed-Adverse-Effect LevelAerosolsDNA GlycosylasesInflammation MediatorsNanotubes, Carbonoxoguanine glycosylase 1, human

Identifiers

PMID26156627
PMCPMC4496819
OpenAlexW1907554865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.