Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26156327›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2015

Chemoimmunotherapy for Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue-Type Lymphoma: A Review of the Literature.

Barbara Kiesewetter, Andrés J M Ferreri, Markus Raderer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Gastric MALT Lymphoma: A 8-Year Experience.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. How do we sequence therapy for marginal zone lymphomas?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Colorectal Lymphoma: A Review.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara KiesewetterDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Unit of Lymphoid Malignancies, Department of Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Andrés J M FerreriDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Unit of Lymphoid Malignancies, Department of Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Markus RadererDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Unit of Lymphoid Malignancies, Department of Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy markus.raderer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiological treatments, chemoimmunotherapy, and radiotherapy are associated with excellent disease control in both gastric and extragastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas. Systemic treatment approaches with both oral and i.v. agents are being increasingly studied, not only for patients with disseminated MALT lymphoma, but also for those with localized disease. To date, however, recommendations for the use of available systemic modalities have not been clearly defined. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe present report reviews the current data on systemic treatment options for patients with MALT lymphoma and provides recommendations for their use in everyday practice.

resultsDifferent chemotherapeutic agents, including anthracyclines, alkylators, and purine analogs, have been successfully tested in patients with MALT lymphoma. Reducing side effects while maintaining efficacy should be the main goal in treating these indolent lymphomas. From the data from the largest trial performed to date, the combination of chlorambucil plus rituximab (R) appears to be active as first-line treatment. Similarly, R-bendamustine also seems to be highly effective, but a longer follow-up period is needed. R-monotherapy results in lower remission rates, but seems a suitable option for less fit patients. New immunotherapeutic agents such as lenalidomide (with or without rituximab) or clarithromycin show solid activity but have not yet been validated in larger collectives.

conclusionPatients with MALT lymphoma should be treated within prospective trials to further define optimal therapeutic strategies. Systemic treatment is a reasonable option with potentially curative intent in everyday practice. Based on the efficacy and safety data from available studies, the present review provides recommendations for the use of systemic strategies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansImmunotherapyLymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal ZoneChemotherapyExtranodal marginal zone lymphomaIndolent lymphomaMucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomaRituximabSystemic treatment

Identifiers

PMID26156327
PMCPMC4524756
OpenAlexW2273507501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.