Trial reportLung2015
Transbronchial Catheter Aspiration and Transbronchial Needle Aspiration in the Diagnostic Workup of Peripheral Lung Lesions.
Trial report in Lung, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound assisted conventional transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solitary peribronchial pulmonary lesion located in the segmental bronchi.Journal of Cancer · 2019Article
- Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy: Where Are We Now? Five Years of a Single-Center Experience.Lung · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIncreasingly frequent, it is clinically indicated to obtain tissue from a peripheral lung lesion (PLL) to yield a pathological diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) and transbronchial catheter aspiration (TBCA) in addition to transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBB) at conventional bronchoscopy.
methodsEligible patients showing a PLL on computed tomography scans were included in the study. In all patients, following TBB, TBNA and TBCA were employed in randomised order under fluoroscopy.
resultsFourty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 46 patients with 46 PLLs were included in the analysis. The mean ± SD diameter of the PLL was 27.0 ± 13.3 mm. The overall sensitivity for all modalities was 69.6%; PLL ≤20 or >20 and ≤30 mm in diameter showed a sensitivity of 60.0 and 72.2%, respectively. For malignant PLL (n = 33), the combined sensitivity of TBNA + TBCA versus TBB was significantly higher (63.6 vs. 33.3%, p ≤ 0.05), and could not further be improved by TBB. For benign PLL, TBB was superior to TBNA + TBCA (76.9 vs. 38.5%).
conclusionsTBB, TBNA and TBCA are complementary to one another. Combining the three techniques, even allows transbronchial specimen collection of PLL <3 cm in diameter at conventional bronchoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.