Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26156262›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

To brood or not to brood: Are marine invertebrates that protect their offspring more resilient to ocean acidification?

Noelle Marie Lucey, Chiara Lombardi, Lucia DeMarchi, Anja Schulze, Maria Cristina Gambi, Piero Calosi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. AnEvolutionary applications · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Metabolic responses to highMarine biology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Noelle Marie Lucey1] University of Pavia, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Pavia 27100, Italy [2] ENEA, Marine Environment and Sustainable Development Unit, La Spezia 19032, Italy [3] Plymouth University, Marine Biology and Ecology Research Centre, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.
Chiara LombardiENEA, Marine Environment and Sustainable Development Unit, La Spezia 19032, Italy.
Lucia DeMarchi1] Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Scienze Marine, La Spezia 19032, Italy [2] Department of Biology &CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Anja SchulzeTexas A&M University at Galveston, Department of Marine Biology, Galveston, Texas 77554, USA.
Maria Cristina GambiStazione Zoologica "Anton Dohrn", Dept. Integrative Marine Ecology, Napoli 80121, Italy.
Piero Calosi1] Plymouth University, Marine Biology and Ecology Research Centre, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK [2] Université du Québec à Rimouski, Département de Biologie, Chimie et Géographie, Rimouski, Québec, G5L 3A1, Canada.
Institute of Marine Science · ITNational Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · ITStazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn · ITTexas A&M University at Galveston · USUniversity of Pavia · ITUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is being absorbed by seawater resulting in increasingly acidic oceans, a process known as ocean acidification (OA). OA is thought to have largely deleterious effects on marine invertebrates, primarily impacting early life stages and consequently, their recruitment and species' survival. Most research in this field has been limited to short-term, single-species and single-life stage studies, making it difficult to determine which taxa will be evolutionarily successful under OA conditions. We circumvent these limitations by relating the dominance and distribution of the known polychaete worm species living in a naturally acidic seawater vent system to their life history strategies. These data are coupled with breeding experiments, showing all dominant species in this natural system exhibit parental care. Our results provide evidence supporting the idea that long-term survival of marine species in acidic conditions is related to life history strategies where eggs are kept in protected maternal environments (brooders) or where larvae have no free swimming phases (direct developers). Our findings are the first to formally validate the hypothesis that species with life history strategies linked to parental care are more protected in an acidifying ocean compared to their relatives employing broadcast spawning and pelagic larval development.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsBehavior, AnimalHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInvertebratesAnimalsClimateSeawater

Identifiers

PMID26156262
PMCPMC4648422
OpenAlexW563751467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.