Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26156223›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

The Genetic Basis of Composite Spike Form in Barley and 'Miracle-Wheat'.

Naser Poursarebani, Tina Seidensticker, Ravi Koppolu, Corinna Trautewig, Piotr Gawroński, Federica Bini, Geetha Govind, Twan Rutten, Shun Sakuma, Akemi Tagiri and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Characterization and Fine Mapping ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Regulation of spikelet number during wheat spike development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PhytoKeys · 2026
    Article
  10. BS-D275: A novel locus on the chromosome arm 2DS governing branched spike development in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Naser PoursarebaniLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Tina SeidenstickerLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Ravi KoppoluLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Corinna TrautewigLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Piotr GawrońskiLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Federica BiniLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Geetha GovindLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Twan RuttenLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Shun SakumaNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Plant Genome Research Unit, Tsukuba 305 8602, Japan.
Akemi TagiriNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Plant Genome Research Unit, Tsukuba 305 8602, Japan.
Gizaw M WoldeLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Helmy M YoussefLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, 12613 Giza, Egypt.
Abdulhamit BattalJohn Innes Centre, Department of Crop Genetics, Colney, Norwich, NR4 7UH, United Kingdom Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Cankaya, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
Stefano CiannameaParco Tecnologico Padano, 26900 Lodi, Italy.
Tiziana FuscaParco Tecnologico Padano, 26900 Lodi, Italy.
Thomas NussbaumerPlant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich, D-85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Carlo PozziParco Tecnologico Padano, 26900 Lodi, Italy.
Andreas BörnerLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Udda LundqvistNordic Genetic Resource Center, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden.
Takao KomatsudaNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Plant Genome Research Unit, Tsukuba 305 8602, Japan.
Silvio SalviDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Roberto TuberosaDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Cristobal UauyJohn Innes Centre, Department of Crop Genetics, Colney, Norwich, NR4 7UH, United Kingdom.
Nese SreenivasuluLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Laura RossiniParco Tecnologico Padano, 26900 Lodi, Italy Università degli Studi di Milano, DiSAA, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
Thorsten SchnurbuschLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, Germany thor@ipk-gatersleben.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5267-0677

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I000712/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000C0628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflorescences of the tribe Triticeae, which includes wheat (Triticum sp. L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) are characterized by sessile spikelets directly borne on the main axis, thus forming a branchless spike. 'Compositum-Barley' and tetraploid 'Miracle-Wheat' (T. turgidum convar. compositum (L.f.) Filat.) display noncanonical spike-branching in which spikelets are replaced by lateral branch-like structures resembling small-sized secondary spikes. As a result of this branch formation 'Miracle-Wheat' produces significantly more grains per spike, leading to higher spike yield. In this study, we first isolated the gene underlying spike-branching in 'Compositum-Barley,' i.e., compositum 2 (com2). Moreover, we found that COM2 is orthologous to the branched head(t) (bh(t)) locus regulating spike branching in tetraploid 'Miracle-Wheat.' Both genes possess orthologs with similar functions in maize BRANCHED SILKLESS 1 (BD1) and rice FRIZZY PANICLE/BRANCHED FLORETLESS 1 (FZP/BFL1) encoding AP2/ERF transcription factors. Sequence analysis of the bh(t) locus in a collection of mutant and wild-type tetraploid wheat accessions revealed that a single amino acid substitution in the DNA-binding domain gave rise to the domestication of 'Miracle-Wheat.' mRNA in situ hybridization, microarray experiments, and independent qRT-PCR validation analyses revealed that the branch repression pathway in barley is governed through the spike architecture gene Six-rowed spike 4 regulating COM2 expression, while HvIDS1 (barley ortholog of maize INDETERMINATE SPIKELET 1) is a putative downstream target of COM2. These findings presented here provide new insights into the genetic basis of spike architecture in Triticeae, and have disclosed new targets for genetic manipulations aiming at boosting wheat's yield potential.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantHordeumPlant ProteinsSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidTranscription FactorsTriticumPlant ProteinsTranscription Factors‘Compositum-Barley’inflorescence branching‘Miracle-Wheat’‘Wunder-Weizen’yield potential

Identifiers

PMID26156223
PMCPMC4566260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.