ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2015
Bendamustine in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The PARP Inhibitor Veliparib Can Be Safely Added to Bendamustine and Rituximab and Has Preliminary Evidence of Activity in B-Cell Lymphoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017Trial
- Bendamustine-Based Regimens as Salvage Therapy in Refractory/Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Retrospective Real-Life Analysis by the Polish Myeloma Group.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- DCEP and bendamustine/prednisone as salvage therapy for quad- and penta-refractory multiple myeloma.Annals of hematology · 2020Article
- Clinical Outcomes Related to the Use of Bendamustine Therapy for Multiple Myeloma Patients Relapsed/Refractory to Immunomodulatory Drugs and Proteasome Inhibitors.Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2017Article
- Bendamustine in heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma patients: Results of a retrospective analysis from the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party.Blood research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTreatment options for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma have improved since the introduction of immune-modulating agents such as lenalidomide and thalidomide. However, almost all patients relapse and suffer from an increasing amount of adverse events due to multiple lines of therapy that eventually lead to a reduced quality of life.
methodsIn this bicentric retrospective analysis, 58 patients who had been treated with either bendamustine monotherapy (62 % of the patients) or combined steroid therapy were included. Further inclusion criteria were at least relapsed disease. Patients had previously been treated with a mean of four lines of therapy (range 1-10). They received a median of three cycles of treatment. Dosage varied from 60 to 300 mg/m(2) (median 120 mg/m(2)) and was administered intravenously on day 1 and 2 of a 28-day cycle.
resultsObserved toxicity was mild and most commonly led to hematological side effects such as thrombopenia and anemia. Response rates were as follows: no complete response, 20 % partial response, 39 % minimal response, 27 % stable disease and 14 % progressive disease. Median overall survival (OS) was 17 months. Median event-free survival was 7 months. Patients who had not received a concomitant steroid had a median OS of 17 months compared to 13 months median OS for patients who had received a concomitant steroid.
conclusionBendamustine monotherapy is an effective treatment option for heavily pre-treated myeloma patients due to its favorable response rate and mild toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.