Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26156122›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2015

Bendamustine in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Elisabeth Stöhr, Frederic Carsten Schmeel, Leonard Christopher Schmeel, Mathias Hänel, Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf, German Refractory Myeloma Study Group

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The PARP Inhibitor Veliparib Can Be Safely Added to Bendamustine and Rituximab and Has Preliminary Evidence of Activity in B-Cell Lymphoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisabeth StöhrDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Frederic Carsten SchmeelDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany. Carsten.Schmeel@ukb.uni-bonn.de.
Leonard Christopher SchmeelDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
Mathias HänelDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Clinicum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Ingo G H Schmidt-WolfDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
German Refractory Myeloma Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment options for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma have improved since the introduction of immune-modulating agents such as lenalidomide and thalidomide. However, almost all patients relapse and suffer from an increasing amount of adverse events due to multiple lines of therapy that eventually lead to a reduced quality of life.

methodsIn this bicentric retrospective analysis, 58 patients who had been treated with either bendamustine monotherapy (62 % of the patients) or combined steroid therapy were included. Further inclusion criteria were at least relapsed disease. Patients had previously been treated with a mean of four lines of therapy (range 1-10). They received a median of three cycles of treatment. Dosage varied from 60 to 300 mg/m(2) (median 120 mg/m(2)) and was administered intravenously on day 1 and 2 of a 28-day cycle.

resultsObserved toxicity was mild and most commonly led to hematological side effects such as thrombopenia and anemia. Response rates were as follows: no complete response, 20 % partial response, 39 % minimal response, 27 % stable disease and 14 % progressive disease. Median overall survival (OS) was 17 months. Median event-free survival was 7 months. Patients who had not received a concomitant steroid had a median OS of 17 months compared to 13 months median OS for patients who had received a concomitant steroid.

conclusionBendamustine monotherapy is an effective treatment option for heavily pre-treated myeloma patients due to its favorable response rate and mild toxicity.

Indexed as

Salvage TherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBendamustine HydrochlorideDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBendamustine HydrochlorideBendamustineDexamethasoneMyelomaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID26156122
PMCPMC11824094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.