Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26155820›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2015

Prospective cohort study protocol to describe the transfer of patients from intensive care units to hospital wards.

Denise L Buchner, Sean M Bagshaw, Peter Dodek, Alan J Forster, Robert A Fowler, François Lamontagne, Alexis F Turgeon, Melissa Potestio, Henry T Stelfox

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Denise L BuchnerFaculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Sean M BagshawDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Peter DodekDivision of Critical Care Medicine and Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Alan J ForsterThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Robert A FowlerDepartment of Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
François LamontagneCentre de Recherche du CHU de Sherbrooke, Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Alexis F TurgeonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, CHU de Quebec Research Center, Quebec City, Canada.
Melissa PotestioCritical Care Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
Henry T StelfoxDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAAlberta Health · CACentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CAOttawa Hospital · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe transfer of patient care between the intensive care unit (ICU) and the hospital ward is associated with increased risk of medical error and adverse events. This study will describe patient transfer from ICU to hospital ward by documenting (1) patient, family and provider experiences related to ICU transfer, (2) communication between stakeholders involved in ICU transfer, (3) adverse events that follow ICU transfer and (4) opportunities to improve ICU to hospital ward transfer.

methodsThis is a mixed methods prospective observational study of ICU to hospital ward transfer practices in 10 ICUs across Canada. We will recruit 50 patients at each site (n=500) who are transferred from ICU to hospital ward, and distribute surveys to enrolled patients, family members, and healthcare providers (ICU and ward physicians and nurses) after patient transfer. A random sample of 6 consenting study participants (patients, family members, healthcare providers) from each study site (n=60) will be offered an opportunity to participate in interviews to further describe stakeholders' experience with ICU to hospital ward transfer. We will abstract information from patient health records to identify clinical data and use of transfer tools, and identify adverse events that are related to the transfer. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics board approval has been obtained at the coordinating study centre (UofC REB13-0021) and 5 study sites (UofA Pro00050646; UBC-PHC H14-01667; Sunnybrook 336-2014; QCH 14-07; Sherbrooke 14-172). Dissemination of the findings will provide a comprehensive description of transfer from ICU to hospital ward in Canada including the uptake of validated or local transfer tools, a conceptual framework of the experiences and needs of stakeholders in the ICU transfer process, a summary of adverse events experienced by patients after transfer from ICU to hospital ward, and opportunities to guide quality improvement efforts.

Indexed as

HospitalizationIntensive Care UnitsCanadaClinical ProtocolsCommunicationContinuity of Patient CareData CollectionHumansInterprofessional RelationsMedical RecordsPatient SafetyPatient TransferProfessional-Patient RelationsProspective StudiesQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID26155820
PMCPMC4499701
OpenAlexW2106228752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.