Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26155766›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Large-scale Direct Targeting for Drug Repositioning and Discovery.

Chunli Zheng, Zihu Guo, Chao Huang, Ziyin Wu, Yan Li, Xuetong Chen, Yingxue Fu, Jinlong Ru, Piar Ali Shar, Yuan Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Network Pharmacology Study on the Molecular Mechanisms of FDY003 for Breast Cancer Treatment.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chunli ZhengBioinformatics Center, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Zihu GuoBioinformatics Center, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Chao HuangBioinformatics Center, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Ziyin WuBioinformatics Center, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Yan LiDepartment of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, 116000, China.
Xuetong ChenBioinformatics Center, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Yingxue FuBioinformatics Center, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Jinlong RuBioinformatics Center, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Piar Ali SharBioinformatics Center, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Yuan WangDepartment of Pathology and MCW Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226. USA.
Yonghua WangBioinformatics Center, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Northwest A&F University · CNDalian University of Technology · CNMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A system-level identification of drug-target direct interactions is vital to drug repositioning and discovery. However, the biological means on a large scale remains challenging and expensive even nowadays. The available computational models mainly focus on predicting indirect interactions or direct interactions on a small scale. To address these problems, in this work, a novel algorithm termed weighted ensemble similarity (WES) has been developed to identify drug direct targets based on a large-scale of 98,327 drug-target relationships. WES includes: (1) identifying the key ligand structural features that are highly-related to the pharmacological properties in a framework of ensemble; (2) determining a drug's affiliation of a target by evaluation of the overall similarity (ensemble) rather than a single ligand judgment; and (3) integrating the standardized ensemble similarities (Z score) by Bayesian network and multi-variate kernel approach to make predictions. All these lead WES to predict drug direct targets with external and experimental test accuracies of 70% and 71%, respectively. This shows that the WES method provides a potential in silico model for drug repositioning and discovery.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryDrug RepositioningAlgorithmsComputational BiologyLigandsReproducibility of ResultsWeb BrowserLigands

Identifiers

PMID26155766
PMCPMC4496667
OpenAlexW2407041001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.