Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26155413›Full record

ReviewOncoimmunology2015

Are BiTEs the "missing link" in cancer therapy?

Carter M Suryadevara, Patrick C Gedeon, Luis Sanchez-Perez, Terence Verla, Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge, Bryan D Choi, Peter E Fecci, John H Sampson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncoimmunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. CD19-ReTARGCancers · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Advanced T and Natural Killer Cell Therapy for Glioblastoma.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carter M SuryadevaraDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program; Division of Neurosurgery; Department of Surgery; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA ; Department of Pathology; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA ; The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA.
Patrick C GedeonDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program; Division of Neurosurgery; Department of Surgery; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA ; The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA ; Department of Biomedical Engineering; Duke University ; Durham, NC, USA.
Luis Sanchez-PerezDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program; Division of Neurosurgery; Department of Surgery; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA ; The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA.
Terence VerlaDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program; Division of Neurosurgery; Department of Surgery; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA ; The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA.
Christopher Alvarez-BreckenridgeDepartment of Neurosurgery; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School ; Boston, MA, USA.
Bryan D ChoiDepartment of Neurosurgery; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School ; Boston, MA, USA.
Peter E FecciDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program; Division of Neurosurgery; Department of Surgery; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA ; The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA.
John H SampsonDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program; Division of Neurosurgery; Department of Surgery; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA ; Department of Pathology; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA ; The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center; Duke University Medical Center ; Durham, NC, USA ; Department of Biomedical Engineering; Duke University ; Durham, NC, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USTexas Neurology · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007171 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KONTOS, CHRISTOPHER D · 1985 to 2021
$31.2M
Medical Scientist Training Program Training GrantT32GM145449 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher D Kontos · 2022 to 2026
$6.6M
EGFRvIII-targeted Bispecific T cell Engagers for brain tumorsR01NS085412 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SAMPSON, JOHN H. · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
Systemic EGFRvIII-targeted bispecific antibody as immunotherapy for glioblastomaF30CA196199 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GEDEON, PATRICK C · 2015 to 2018
$165k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA196199NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007171NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145449NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional treatment for cancer routinely includes surgical resection and some combination of chemotherapy and radiation. These approaches are frequently accompanied by unintended and highly toxic collateral damage to healthy tissues, which are offset by only marginal prognostic improvements in patients with advanced cancers. This unfortunate balance has driven the development of novel therapies that aim to target tumors both safely and efficiently. Over the past decade, mounting evidence has supported the therapeutic utility of T-cell-centered cancer immunotherapy, which, in its various iterations, has been shown capable of eliciting highly precise and robust antitumor responses both in animal models and human trials. The identification of tumor-specific targets has further fueled a growing interest in T-cell therapies given their potential to circumvent the non-specific nature of traditional treatments. Of the several strategies geared toward achieving T-cell recognition of tumor, bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) represent a novel class of biologics that have garnered enthusiasm in recent years due to their versatility, specificity, safety, cost, and ease of production. Bispecific T-cell Engagers (BiTEs) are a subclass of bsAbs that are specific for CD3 on one arm and a tumor antigen on the second. As such, BiTEs function by recruiting and activating polyclonal populations of T-cells at tumor sites, and do so without the need for co-stimulation or conventional MHC recognition. Blinatumomab, a well-characterized BiTE, has emerged as a promising recombinant bscCD19×CD3 construct that has demonstrated remarkable antitumor activity in patients with B-cell malignancies. This clinical success has resulted in the rapid extension of BiTE technology against a greater repertoire of tumor antigens and the recent US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) accelerated approval of blinatumomab for the treatment of a rare form of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In this review, we dissect the role of T-cell therapeutics in the new era of cancer immunotherapy, appraise the value of CAR T-cells in the context of solid tumors, and discuss why the BiTE platform may rescue several of the apparent deficits and shortcomings of competing immunotherapies to support its widespread clinical application.

Indexed as

ACT, adoptive cell therapyAICD, activation induced cell deathALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemiaAPC, antigen presenting cellbispecific antibodiesBiTE, bispecific T-cell engagerBsAb, bispecific antibodyCAR, chimeric antigen receptorsCHO, chinese hamster ovaryCML, chronic myeloid leukemiaGBM, glioblastomaimmunotherapyMAb, monoclonal antibodymalignanciesMHC, major histocompatibility complexOS, overall survivalScFv, single chain variable fragmentTAA, tumor associated antigensTCR, T-cell receptorTIL, tumor infiltrating lymphocytesT lymphocytesTREG, regulatory T-cellsTSA, tumor specific antigensVV, vaccinia virus

Identifiers

PMID26155413
PMCPMC4485829
OpenAlexW1912794777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.