ReviewOncoimmunology2015
Are BiTEs the "missing link" in cancer therapy?
Review in Oncoimmunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- The safety and efficacy of bispecific T-cell engagers (TCEs) in patients with glioma.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- A multiscale physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to support mRNA-encoded BiTE therapy in cancer treatment.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- T cells in cancer: mechanistic insights and therapeutic advances.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- CD19-ReTARGCancers · 2025Article
- Clinical progress in the development of CAR T cells to treat malignant glioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Advances in cancer immunotherapy: Strategies and innovations strategies for adoptive immunotherapy of cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- 10 years of BiTE immunotherapy: an overview with a focus on pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Advanced T and Natural Killer Cell Therapy for Glioblastoma.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2023Article
- Gene Targets of CAR-T Cell Therapy for Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2023Review
- Oncolytic adenovirus coding for bispecific T cell engager against human MUC-1 potentiates T cell response against solid tumors.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2023Article
- Activation of T Lymphocytes with Anti-PDL1-BiTE in the Presence of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (ASCs).BioMed research international · 2023Article
- Bispecific Antibodies: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Solid Tumors.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- [Chinese consensus for the bispeific T cell engager in the treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (2022)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022Article
- Combination therapy with CAR T cells and oncolytic viruses: a new era in cancer immunotherapy.Cancer gene therapy · 2022Review
- Biological causes of immunogenic cancer cell death (ICD) and anti-tumor therapy; Combination of Oncolytic virus-based immunotherapy and CAR T-cell therapy for ICD induction.Cancer cell international · 2022Review
- Computational Analysis of Cytokine Release Following Bispecific T-Cell Engager Therapy: Applications of a Logic-Based Model.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Protein Engineering: Advances in Phage Display for Basic Science and Medical Research.Biochemistry. Biokhimiia · 2022Review
- Current progress in chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for glioblastoma multiforme.Cancer medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional treatment for cancer routinely includes surgical resection and some combination of chemotherapy and radiation. These approaches are frequently accompanied by unintended and highly toxic collateral damage to healthy tissues, which are offset by only marginal prognostic improvements in patients with advanced cancers. This unfortunate balance has driven the development of novel therapies that aim to target tumors both safely and efficiently. Over the past decade, mounting evidence has supported the therapeutic utility of T-cell-centered cancer immunotherapy, which, in its various iterations, has been shown capable of eliciting highly precise and robust antitumor responses both in animal models and human trials. The identification of tumor-specific targets has further fueled a growing interest in T-cell therapies given their potential to circumvent the non-specific nature of traditional treatments. Of the several strategies geared toward achieving T-cell recognition of tumor, bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) represent a novel class of biologics that have garnered enthusiasm in recent years due to their versatility, specificity, safety, cost, and ease of production. Bispecific T-cell Engagers (BiTEs) are a subclass of bsAbs that are specific for CD3 on one arm and a tumor antigen on the second. As such, BiTEs function by recruiting and activating polyclonal populations of T-cells at tumor sites, and do so without the need for co-stimulation or conventional MHC recognition. Blinatumomab, a well-characterized BiTE, has emerged as a promising recombinant bscCD19×CD3 construct that has demonstrated remarkable antitumor activity in patients with B-cell malignancies. This clinical success has resulted in the rapid extension of BiTE technology against a greater repertoire of tumor antigens and the recent US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) accelerated approval of blinatumomab for the treatment of a rare form of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In this review, we dissect the role of T-cell therapeutics in the new era of cancer immunotherapy, appraise the value of CAR T-cells in the context of solid tumors, and discuss why the BiTE platform may rescue several of the apparent deficits and shortcomings of competing immunotherapies to support its widespread clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.