Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26155408›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2015

Trial watch: Naked and vectored DNA-based anticancer vaccines.

Norma Bloy, Aitziber Buqué, Fernando Aranda, Francesca Castoldi, Alexander Eggermont, Isabelle Cremer, Catherine Sautès-Fridman, Jitka Fucikova, Jérôme Galon, Radek Spisek and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Facts and Hopes: CAR T-Cell Therapy and Immune Contexture in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Cancer immunotherapy of Wilms tumor: a narrative review.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Norma BloyGustave Roussy Cancer Campus ; Villejuif, France ; INSERM , U1138; Paris, France ; Equipe 11 labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer; Center de Recherche des Cordeliers ; Paris, France.
Aitziber BuquéGustave Roussy Cancer Campus ; Villejuif, France ; INSERM , U1138; Paris, France ; Equipe 11 labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer; Center de Recherche des Cordeliers ; Paris, France.
Fernando ArandaGroup of Immune receptors of the Innate and Adaptive System; Institut d'Investigacions Biomédiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS); Barcelona, Spain.
Francesca CastoldiGustave Roussy Cancer Campus ; Villejuif, France ; INSERM , U1138; Paris, France ; Equipe 11 labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer; Center de Recherche des Cordeliers ; Paris, France ; Faculté de Medicine; Université Paris Sud/Paris XI ; Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France ; Sotio a.c ; Prague, Czech Republic.
Alexander EggermontGustave Roussy Cancer Campus ; Villejuif, France.
Isabelle CremerINSERM , U1138; Paris, France ; Equipe 13; Center de Recherche des Cordeliers ; Paris, France ; Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Paris VI ; Paris, France.
Catherine Sautès-FridmanINSERM , U1138; Paris, France ; Equipe 13; Center de Recherche des Cordeliers ; Paris, France ; Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Paris VI ; Paris, France.
Jitka FucikovaSotio a.c ; Prague, Czech Republic ; Dept. of Immunology; 2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol; Charles University ; Prague, Czech Republic.
Jérôme GalonINSERM , U1138; Paris, France ; Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Paris VI ; Paris, France ; Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology; Center de Recherche des Cordeliers ; Paris, France ; Université Paris Descartes/Paris V; Sorbonne Paris Cité ; Paris, France.
Radek SpisekSotio a.c ; Prague, Czech Republic ; Dept. of Immunology; 2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol; Charles University ; Prague, Czech Republic.
Eric TartourUniversité Paris Descartes/Paris V; Sorbonne Paris Cité ; Paris, France ; INSERM , U970; Paris, France ; Paris-Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC) ; Paris, France ; Service d'Immunologie Biologique; Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP); AP-HP ; Paris, France.
Laurence ZitvogelGustave Roussy Cancer Campus ; Villejuif, France ; INSERM, U1015, CICBT507 ; Villejuif, France.
Guido KroemerINSERM , U1138; Paris, France ; Equipe 11 labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer; Center de Recherche des Cordeliers ; Paris, France ; Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Paris VI ; Paris, France ; Université Paris Descartes/Paris V; Sorbonne Paris Cité ; Paris, France ; Pôle de Biologie; Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou; AP-HP ; Paris, France ; Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus ; Villejuif, France.
Lorenzo GalluzziGustave Roussy Cancer Campus ; Villejuif, France ; INSERM , U1138; Paris, France ; Equipe 11 labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer; Center de Recherche des Cordeliers ; Paris, France ; Université Pierre et Marie Curie/Paris VI ; Paris, France ; Université Paris Descartes/Paris V; Sorbonne Paris Cité ; Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One type of anticancer vaccine relies on the administration of DNA constructs encoding one or multiple tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). The ultimate objective of these preparations, which can be naked or vectored by non-pathogenic viruses, bacteria or yeast cells, is to drive the synthesis of TAAs in the context of an immunostimulatory milieu, resulting in the (re-)elicitation of a tumor-targeting immune response. In spite of encouraging preclinical results, the clinical efficacy of DNA-based vaccines employed as standalone immunotherapeutic interventions in cancer patients appears to be limited. Thus, efforts are currently being devoted to the development of combinatorial regimens that allow DNA-based anticancer vaccines to elicit clinically relevant immune responses. Here, we discuss recent advances in the preclinical and clinical development of this therapeutic paradigm.

Indexed as

adjuvantsAFP, α-fetoproteinAPC, antigen-presenting cellCDR, complementarity-determining regionCEA, carcinoembryonic antigenCIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaCTLA4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte protein 4DAMP, damage-associated molecular patternDC, dendritic celldendritic cellelectroporationFDA, Food and Drug AdministrationGM-CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factorGX-188EHCC, hepatocellular carcinomaHNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinomaHPV, human papillomavirusIL, interleukinmucosal immunityOS, overall survivalOVA, ovalbuminPAP, prostate acid phosphataseSCGB2A2, secretoglobin, family 2A, member 2SOX2, SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2TAA, tumor-associated antigenT, brachyury homologTLR, Toll-like receptorTRA, tumor rejection antigenTreg, regulatory T cellVGX-3100WT1, Wilms tumor 1

Identifiers

PMID26155408
PMCPMC4485755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.