ArticleKorean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2014
Clinical feasibility and nutritional effects of early oral feeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Article in Korean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systematic review of methodology in nutritional trials in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Review
- Supplemental parenteral nutrition within an enhanced recovery program for open pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Impact of feeding strategy after pancreatoduodenectomy on delayed gastric emptying and hospital stay: nationwide study.BJS open · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- ERAS with or without supplemental artificial nutrition in open pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. A multicenter, randomized, open labeled trial (RASTA study protocol).Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in Vietnamese patients with periampullary of Vater malignancies: A single-institution prospective study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- Short-term clinical outcomes of enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition after surgery for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2019Article
- Application of an early oral feeding protocol after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019Article
- Effect of early and delay starting of enteral feeding in post-pancreaticoduodenectomy patients.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2019Article
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Hepatobiliary.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2018Review
- A Study on the Dietary Intake and the Nutritional Status among the Pancreatic Cancer Surgical Patients.Clinical nutrition research · 2016Article
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncologyReview
- PANCREATODUODENECTOMY: BRAZILIAN PRACTICE PATTERNS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS/
aimsPancreaticoduodenctomy (PD) is associated with high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Although many studies have shown that early postoperative enteral nutrition improves postoperative outcomes, limited clinical information is available on postoperative early oral feeding (EOF) after PD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility, safety, and nutritional effects of EOF after PD.
methodsClinical outcomes were investigated in 131 patients who underwent PD between 2003 and 2013, including 81 whose oral feeding was commenced within 48 hours (EOF group) and 50 whose oral feeding was commenced after resumption of bowel movements (traditional oral feeding [TOF] group). Postoperative complications, energy intake, and length of stay (LOS) were reviewed.
resultsDemographic factors were similar in the two groups. The EOF group had a significantly shorter LOS (25.9±8.5 days vs. 32.3±16.3 days; p=0.01) than the TOF group. The rates of anastomotic leak (1.2% vs. 16%, p=0.00) and reoperation (3.7% vs. 20%, p=0.01) were significantly lower in the EOF group. In the clinically acute phase from postoperative day 1 to day 5, the mean daily calorie intake (847.0 kcal vs. 745.6 kcal; p=0.04) and mean daily protein intake (42.2 g vs. 31.9 g; p=0.00) in the EOF group were significantly higher than that in the TOF group.
conclusionsPostoperative EOF is a clinically safe, feasible, and effective method of nutritional support after PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.