Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26154803›Full record

ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2015

A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

H Jaap Bonjer, Charlotte L Deijen, Eva Haglind, COLOR II Study Group

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readLetterComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03683446 completednot on this map

Trends and Outcomes in Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer From 2005 to 2016 Using the ACS-NSQIP Database, a Retrospective Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCatherine H. Davis, MDRan2005 to 2017Enrolled31,795ConditionsColorectal Adenocarcinoma, Colorectal SurgeryArmsLaparoscopic rectal surgery, Open rectal surgery
NCT04163887 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effect of the Laparoscopic Approach in Reducing Postoperative Severe Complications Following Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut Mutualiste MontsourisRan2021 to 2026Enrolled340ConditionsLiver Metastasis Colon Cancer, Postoperative ComplicationsArmshepatectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Short- and Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Rectal Cancer Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Sarcopenia in Colorectal Cancer Surgery-Minimally Invasive vs. Open.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H Jaap Bonjer
Charlotte L Deijen
Eva Haglind
COLOR II Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAdenocarcinomaDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26154803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.