Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26154300›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Comparative Metagenomic Profiling of Symbiotic Bacterial Communities Associated with Ixodes persulcatus, Ixodes pavlovskyi and Dermacentor reticulatus Ticks.

Alexander Kurilshikov, Natalya N Livanova, Nataliya V Fomenko, Alexey E Tupikin, Vera A Rar, Marsel R Kabilov, Stanislav G Livanov, Nina V Tikunova

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current debates and advances in tick microbiome research.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Review
  10. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. MonitoringInsects · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander KurilshikovInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Natalya N LivanovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia; Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nataliya V FomenkoInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexey E TupikinInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Vera A RarInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Marsel R KabilovInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Stanislav G LivanovInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nina V TikunovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine · RUInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals · RUSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ixodes persulcatus, Ixodes pavlovskyi, and Dermacentor reticulatus ticks inhabiting Western Siberia are responsible for the transmission of a number of etiological agents that cause human and animal tick-borne diseases. Because these ticks are abundant in the suburbs of large cities, agricultural areas, and popular tourist sites and frequently attack people and livestock, data regarding the microbiomes of these organisms are required. Using metagenomic 16S profiling, we evaluate bacterial communities associated with I. persulcatus, I. pavlovskyi, and D. reticulatus ticks collected from the Novosibirsk region of Russia. A total of 1214 ticks were used for this study. DNA extracted from the ticks was pooled according to tick species and sex. Sequencing of the V3-V5 domains of 16S rRNA genes was performed using the Illumina Miseq platform. The following bacterial genera were prevalent in the examined communities: Acinetobacter (all three tick species), Rickettsia (I. persulcatus and D. reticulatus) and Francisella (D. reticulatus). B. burgdorferi sensu lato and B. miyamotoi sequences were detected in I. persulcatus and I. pavlovskyi but not in D. reticulatus ticks. The pooled samples of all tick species studied contained bacteria from the Anaplasmataceae family, although their occurrence was low. DNA from A. phagocytophilum and Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis was first observed in I. pavlovskyi ticks. Significant inter-species differences in the number of bacterial taxa as well as intra-species diversity related to tick sex were observed. The bacterial communities associated with the I. pavlovskyi ticks displayed a higher biodiversity compared with those of the I. persulcatus and D. reticulatus ticks. Bacterial community structure was also diverse across the studied tick species, as shown by permutational analysis of variance using the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity metric (p = 0.002). Between-sex variation was confirmed by PERMANOVA testing in I. persulcatus (p = 0.042) and I. pavlovskyi (p = 0.042) ticks. Our study indicated that 16S metagenomic profiling could be used for rapid assessment of the occurrence of medically important bacteria in tick populations inhabiting different natural biotopes and therefore the epidemic danger of studied foci.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsAnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityDermacentorFemaleIxodesMaleSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID26154300
PMCPMC4496043
OpenAlexW1489444494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.