ArticleNature biotechnology2015
Toward effective software solutions for big biology.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Open Science Practices in Psychiatric Genetics: A Primer.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2024Review
- iSMOD: an integrative browser for image-based single-cell multi-omics data.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- The Plant Phenomics and Genomics Research Data Repository: An On-Premise Approach for FAIR-Compliant Data Acquisition.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- A workflow reproducibility scale for automatic validation of biological interpretation results.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Workflow sharing with automated metadata validation and test execution to improve the reusability of published workflows.GigaScience · 2022Article
- A spectrum of free software tools for processing the VCF variant call format: vcflib, bio-vcf, cyvcf2, hts-nim and slivar.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Sapporo: A workflow execution service that encourages the reuse of workflows in various languages in bioinformatics.F1000Research · 2022Article
- Open-source Software Sustainability Models: Initial White Paper From the Informatics Technology for Cancer Research Sustainability and Industry Partnership Working Group.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Review
- Highlights from the Era of Open Source Web-Based Tools.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Review
- Bioimage Analysis and Cell Motility.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Review
- An environment for sustainable research software in Germany and beyond: current state, open challenges, and call for action.F1000Research · 2020Article
- Bionitio: demonstrating and facilitating best practices for bioinformatics command-line software.GigaScience · 2019Article
- Accumulating computational resource usage of genomic data analysis workflow to optimize cloud computing instance selection.GigaScience · 2019Article
- Software engineering principles to improve quality and performance of R software.PeerJ. Computer science · 2019Article
- Sharing and reusing cell image data.Molecular biology of the cell · 2018Article
- CRISPRdisco: An Automated Pipeline for the Discovery and Analysis of CRISPR-Cas Systems.The CRISPR journal · 2018Article
- Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS): design and first-year review.PeerJ preprints · 2018Article
- Discovering and linking public omics data sets using the Omics Discovery Index.Nature biotechnology · 2017Article
- Ten simple rules for making research software more robust.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26154002What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.