Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26153699›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

Microconstriction arrays for high-throughput quantitative measurements of cell mechanical properties.

Janina R Lange, Julian Steinwachs, Thorsten Kolb, Lena A Lautscham, Irina Harder, Graeme Whyte, Ben Fabry

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Characterization of cellular wound resistance in the giant ciliatebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Imaging the subcellular viscoelastic properties of mouse oocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Janina R LangeBiophysics Group, Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Julian SteinwachsBiophysics Group, Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Thorsten KolbBiophysics Group, Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Division of Molecular Genetics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lena A LautschamBiophysics Group, Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Irina HarderMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany.
Graeme WhyteInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Department of Physics, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
Ben FabryBiophysics Group, Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: bfabry@biomed.uni-erlangen.de.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeriot-Watt University · GBMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light · DE

Funding

RESISTANCE OF THE CELL TO SHAPE DISTORTION--BASIS OF CYTOSKELETAL MECHANICSP01HL033009 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI ROGERS, RICK · 1985 to 2005
$10.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL033009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a method for quantifying the mechanical properties of cells in suspension with a microfluidic device consisting of a parallel array of micron-sized constrictions. Using a high-speed charge-coupled device camera, we measure the flow speed, cell deformation, and entry time into the constrictions of several hundred cells per minute during their passage through the device. From the flow speed and the occupation state of the microconstriction array with cells, the driving pressure across each constriction is continuously computed. Cell entry times into microconstrictions decrease with increased driving pressure and decreased cell size according to a power law. From this power-law relationship, the cell elasticity and fluidity can be estimated. When cells are treated with drugs that depolymerize or stabilize the cytoskeleton or the nucleus, elasticity and fluidity data from all treatments collapse onto a master curve. Power-law rheology and collapse onto a master curve are predicted by the theory of soft glassy materials and have been previously shown to describe the mechanical behavior of cells adhering to a substrate. Our finding that this theory also applies to cells in suspension provides the foundation for a quantitative high-throughput measurement of cell mechanical properties with microfluidic devices.

Indexed as

Cell Physiological PhenomenaLab-On-A-Chip DevicesCell Line, TumorCell NucleusCytoskeletonEquipment DesignGlassHumansMechanical PhenomenaMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrotechnologyModels, TheoreticalPressureRheology

Identifiers

PMID26153699
PMCPMC4571004
OpenAlexW1944193636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.