ArticleBiophysical journal2015
Inferring diffusion dynamics from FCS in heterogeneous nuclear environments.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy for particle sizing: A notorious challenge.Biophysical journal · 2025Review
- DiffMAP-GP: Continuous 2D diffusion maps from particle trajectories without data binning using Gaussian processes.Biophysical reports · 2025Article
- Learning Continuous 2D Diffusion Maps from Particle Trajectories without Data Binning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Rapid ensemble measurement of protein diffusion and probe blinking dynamics in cells.Biophysical reports · 2021Article
- HEXIM1 Diffusion in the Nucleus Is Regulated by Its Interactions with Both 7SK and P-TEFb.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- An alternative framework for fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Determination of oligomerization state of Drp1 protein in living cells at nanomolar concentrations.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Single quantum dot tracking reveals the impact of nanoparticle surface on intracellular state.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Unraveling the Thousand Word Picture: An Introduction to Super-Resolution Data Analysis.Chemical reviews · 2017Article
- Pitching single-focus confocal data analysis one photon at a time with Bayesian nonparametrics.Physical review. XArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) is a noninvasive technique that probes the diffusion dynamics of proteins down to single-molecule sensitivity in living cells. Critical mechanistic insight is often drawn from FCS experiments by fitting the resulting time-intensity correlation function, G(t), to known diffusion models. When simple models fail, the complex diffusion dynamics of proteins within heterogeneous cellular environments can be fit to anomalous diffusion models with adjustable anomalous exponents. Here, we take a different approach. We use the maximum entropy method to show-first using synthetic data-that a model for proteins diffusing while stochastically binding/unbinding to various affinity sites in living cells gives rise to a G(t) that could otherwise be equally well fit using anomalous diffusion models. We explain the mechanistic insight derived from our method. In particular, using real FCS data, we describe how the effects of cell crowding and binding to affinity sites manifest themselves in the behavior of G(t). Our focus is on the diffusive behavior of an engineered protein in 1) the heterochromatin region of the cell's nucleus as well as 2) in the cell's cytoplasm and 3) in solution. The protein consists of the basic region-leucine zipper (BZip) domain of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) fused to fluorescent proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.