Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26153419›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Recombinant transfer in the basic genome of Escherichia coli.

Purushottam D Dixit, Tin Yau Pang, F William Studier, Sergei Maslov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phylogenetic Group Distribution of UropathogenicFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamics of dN/dS within recombining bacterial populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Evolution of homologous recombination rates across bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Modeling the mosaic structure of bacterial genomes to infer their evolutionary history.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic Characterization of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Genomic Analysis of a Hybrid Enteroaggregative HemorrhagicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Purushottam D DixitBiological, Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973.
Tin Yau PangBiological, Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973.
F William StudierBiological, Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 studier@bnl.gov ssmaslov@gmail.com.
Sergei MaslovBiological, Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 studier@bnl.gov ssmaslov@gmail.com.
Brookhaven National Laboratory · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An approximation to the ∼4-Mbp basic genome shared by 32 strains of Escherichia coli representing six evolutionary groups has been derived and analyzed computationally. A multiple alignment of the 32 complete genome sequences was filtered to remove mobile elements and identify the most reliable ∼90% of the aligned length of each of the resulting 496 basic-genome pairs. Patterns of single base-pair mutations (SNPs) in aligned pairs distinguish clonally inherited regions from regions where either genome has acquired DNA fragments from diverged genomes by homologous recombination since their last common ancestor. Such recombinant transfer is pervasive across the basic genome, mostly between genomes in the same evolutionary group, and generates many unique mosaic patterns. The six least-diverged genome pairs have one or two recombinant transfers of length ∼40-115 kbp (and few if any other transfers), each containing one or more gene clusters known to confer strong selective advantage in some environments. Moderately diverged genome pairs (0.4-1% SNPs) show mosaic patterns of interspersed clonal and recombinant regions of varying lengths throughout the basic genome, whereas more highly diverged pairs within an evolutionary group or pairs between evolutionary groups having >1.3% SNPs have few clonal matches longer than a few kilobase pairs. Many recombinant transfers appear to incorporate fragments of the entering DNA produced by restriction systems of the recipient cell. A simple computational model can closely fit the data. Most recombinant transfers seem likely to be due to generalized transduction by coevolving populations of phages, which could efficiently distribute variability throughout bacterial genomes.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialTransformation, GeneticBacteriophagesBase PairingBiological EvolutionClone CellsEscherichia coliGenetic VectorsModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence AnnotationMosaicismPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRecombination, GeneticRestriction MappingTransduction, Geneticbasic genomecore genomeE. coli evolutiongeneralized transductionrecombinant transfer

Identifiers

PMID26153419
PMCPMC4517234
OpenAlexW1538557694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.