ArticleThe Laryngoscope2016
In vivo investigation of acidified pepsin exposure to porcine vocal fold epithelia.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The relationship of laryngopharyngeal reflux-related signs and symptoms to vocal complaints in professional classical singers.Croatian medical journal · 2026Article
- Eliciting and Characterizing Porcine Vocalizations: When Pigs Fly.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2024Article
- Pepsin concentration in oral lavage fluid of rabbit reflux model constructed by dilating the lower esophageal sphincter.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2023Article
- Furosemide-induced systemic dehydration alters the proteome of rabbit vocal folds.Journal of proteomics · 2022Article
- Unraveling the molecular pathobiology of vocal fold systemic dehydration using an in vivo rabbit model.PloS one · 2020Article
- Cigarette Smoke Exposure to Pig Larynx in an Inhalation Chamber.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2019Article
- A Method to Administer Agents to the Larynx in an Awake Large Animal.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectives/hypothesisThe study objective was to investigate epithelial changes in response to direct, repeated, acidified pepsin exposures in an in vivo porcine model. We hypothesized that 12 acidified pepsin applications to simulate reflux would elicit a vocal fold response characterized by inflammation, epithelial proliferation, and increased intercellular space, as well as changes in the gene expression of epithelial junctional proteins, ion transporter proteins, and proinflammatory cytokines. STUDY
designProspective, in vivo study.
methodsPigs received acidified pepsin (pH = 4) or saline (sham) applied directly to vocal folds. Larynges were collected following three exposures per week for 4 weeks. Vocal fold tissue morphology, collagen, and elastin were evaluated histologically. Gene expression of E-cadherin, zona occludens-1, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, epithelial sodium channel, interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interferon-γ were measured. Ultrastructural alterations, epithelial intercellular space diameter, and microridge height were measured using transmission electron microscopy.
resultsThere were no significant differences in histology, gene transcripts, epithelial ultrastructure, intercellular space, and microridge height after acidified pepsin exposure.
conclusionsTwelve simulated reflux challenges were insufficient to elicit epithelial changes, demonstrating the resistance of healthy vocal folds to direct, repeated acidified pepsin exposures. These data increase our understanding of healthy vocal fold defenses and lay the groundwork for a prospective, uninjured, nonsurgical, laryngopharyngeal reflux model where pigs can be exposed directly to acidified pepsin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.