Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26152644›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2015

Predicting Scheduling and Attending for an Oral Cancer Examination.

James A Shepperd, Amber S Emanuel, Jennifer L Howell, Henrietta L Logan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Prevalence and predictors of medical information avoidance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effectiveness of Health Belief Model on Oral Cancer Prevention in Smoker Men.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James A ShepperdSoutheast Center for Research on Disparities in Oral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. shepperd@ufl.edu.
Amber S EmanuelSoutheast Center for Research on Disparities in Oral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jennifer L HowellSoutheast Center for Research on Disparities in Oral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Henrietta L LoganSoutheast Center for Research on Disparities in Oral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

Statistics and Data Coordinating CenterU54DE019261 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI RILEY, JOSEPH L · 2008 to 2012
$5.4M
NIDCR NIH HHS 1U54DE019261NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE019261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral and pharyngeal cancer is highly treatable if diagnosed early, yet late diagnosis is commonplace apparently because of delays in undergoing an oral cancer examination. PURPOSE: We explored predictors of scheduling and attending an oral cancer examination among a sample of Black and White men who were at high risk for oral cancer because they smoked.

methodsDuring an in-person interview, participants (N = 315) from rural Florida learned about oral and pharyngeal cancer, completed survey measures, and were offered a free examination in the next week. Later, participants received a follow-up phone call to explore why they did or did not attend their examination.

resultsConsistent with the notion that scheduling and attending an oral cancer exam represent distinct decisions, we found that the two outcomes had different predictors. Defensive avoidance and exam efficacy predicted scheduling an examination; exam efficacy and having coping resources, time, and transportation predicted attending the examination. Open-ended responses revealed that the dominant reasons participants offered for missing a scheduled examination were conflicting obligations, forgetting, and confusion or misunderstanding about the examination.

conclusionsThe results suggest interventions to increase scheduling and attending an oral cancer examination.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient ComplianceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsPhysical ExaminationSmokingBarriers to screeningCoping resourcesDefensive avoidanceExaminationOral and pharyngeal cancerScreening

Identifiers

PMID26152644
PMCPMC4636473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.