Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26152568›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2015

A multifaceted feedback strategy alone does not improve the adherence to organizational guideline-based standards: a cluster randomized trial in intensive care.

Maartje L G de Vos, Sabine N van der Veer, Bram Wouterse, Wilco C Graafmans, Niels Peek, Nicolette F de Keizer, Kitty J Jager, Gert P Westert, Peter H J van der Voort

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. [Quality indicators in intensive care medicine : Background and practical use].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Process evaluation of the effects of patient safety auditing in hospital care (part 2).International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maartje L G de VosScientific Centre for Transformation in Care and Welfare (Tranzo), University of Tilburg, PO Box 90153, , 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands. mdevos@amphia.nl.
Sabine N van der VeerDepartment of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, , 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.n.vanderveer@amc.nl.
Bram WouterseScientific Centre for Transformation in Care and Welfare (Tranzo), University of Tilburg, PO Box 90153, , 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands. b.wouterse@cpb.nl.
Wilco C GraafmansHealth Strategy and Health Systems Unit, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium. wgraafmans@zinl.nl.
Niels PeekHealth e-Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. n.b.peek@amc.uva.nl.
Nicolette F de KeizerDepartment of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, , 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.f.keizer@amc.uva.nl.
Kitty J JagerDepartment of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, , 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. k.j.jager@amc.uva.nl.
Gert P WestertScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. g.westert@iq.umcn.nl.
Peter H J van der VoortDepartment of Intensive Care, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, PO Box 95500, , 1090 HM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.h.j.vandervoort@olvg.nl.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_13042Medical Research Council MR/K006665/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrganizational data such as bed occupancy rate and nurse-to-patient ratio are related to clinical outcomes and to the efficient use of intensive care unit (ICU) resources. Standards for these performance indicators are provided in guidelines. We studied the effects of a multifaceted feedback strategy to improve the adherence to these standards.

methodsIn a cluster randomized controlled study design the intervention ICUs received extensive monthly feedback reports, they received outreach visits and initiated a quality improvement team. The control ICUs received limited quarterly feedback reports only. We collected primary data prospectively within the setting of a Dutch national ICU registry over a 14-month study period. The target indicators were bed occupancy rate (aiming at 80 % or below) and nurse-to-patient ratio (aiming at 0.5 or higher). Data were collected per 8-h nursing shift. Logistic regression analysis was performed. For both study end points, the odds ratios (OR) for improvements at follow-up versus at baseline were calculated separately for control and intervention ICUs.

resultsWe analyzed data on 67,237 nursing shifts. The bed occupancy rate did not improve in the intervention group compared to baseline (adjusted OR 0.88; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.62-1.27) or compared to control group (OR 0.67; 95 % CI 0.39-1.15). The nurse-to-patient ratio did not improve (OR 0.72; 95 % CI 0.41-1.26 compared to baseline and OR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.35-1.19 compared to control group).

conclusionsA multifaceted feedback intervention did not improve the adherence to guideline-based standards on the organizational issues bed occupancy rate and nurse-to-patient ratio in the ICU. The reasons may be a limited confidence in data quality, the lack of practical tools for improvement, and the relatively short follow-up.

trial registrationISRCTN: ISRCTN50542146.

Indexed as

FeedbackBed OccupancyCritical Care NursingGuideline AdherenceHumansIntensive Care UnitsNetherlandsQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID26152568
PMCPMC4495635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.