Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26152413›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2015

Current Surveys of the Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Leishmania infantum, Babesia canis, Angiostrongylus vasorum and Dirofilaria immitis in Dogs in Bulgaria.

Nikola Pantchev, Manuela Schnyder, Majda Globokar Vrhovec, Roland Schaper, Ilia Tsachev

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical canineCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. First molecular evidence ofOpen veterinary journal · 2024
    Article
  9. Serological Assessment ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular detection of Spirochetes andOpen veterinary journal · 2023
    Article
  12. Canine Babesiosis Caused by LargeAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Serological evidence of possibleNew microbes and new infections · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Simultaneous Exposure toPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Epidemiological and Clinicopathological Features ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Nikola PantchevIDEXX Laboratories, 71636, Ludwigsburg, Germany, nikola-pantchev@idexx.com.
Manuela Schnyder
Majda Globokar Vrhovec
Roland Schaper
Ilia Tsachev
IDEXX Laboratories (France) · FRBayer (Germany) · DETrakia University · BGUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canine vector-borne diseases (CVBDs) have increasingly become a focus of interest in recent years. Some of the CVBDs are zoonotic and may therefore also represent a risk for the human population. Different factors are in discussion to explain the expansion of vectors and pathogens into formerly unaffected areas. Knowledge of the prevalence and distribution of CVBDs in Bulgaria is scant overall and most data rely on single case descriptions. The aim of the present study was to determine the seroprevalence of important CVBDs in 167 dogs from central-southern Bulgaria (Stara Zagora), with special emphasis on hitherto uninvestigated babesiosis and angiostrongylosis, on poorly investigated Lyme borreliosis and canine granulocytic anaplasmosis, and on the potentially zoonotic dirofilariosis and leishmaniosis. Relatively high prevalence rates were documented for anti-Babesia canis antibodies, Dirofilaria immitis antigen (16.2 %; 27/167 each), anti-Ehrlichia canis (21 %; 35/167) and anti-Anaplasma phagocytophilum antibodies (30.5 - 46.1 %; 51 - 77/167), while Borrelia burgdorferi seroprevalence was low (2.4 %; 4/167). All samples were negative for Leishmania infantum antibodies and Angiostrongylus vasorum antigen and antibodies. In total, 64.7 % (108/167) of the samples indicated infection or exposure to at least one agent and a high proportion of dual infections (39.8 %; 43/108) was demonstrated. Multiple infections with up to four different organisms were also detected. Our data underline the importance of CVBDs and especially of co-infections which could influence the clinical outcome in dogs.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumAngiostrongylusAnimalsBabesiaBabesiosisBorrelia burgdorferiBulgariaCoinfectionDirofilaria immitisDirofilariasisDog DiseasesDogsEhrlichia canisEhrlichiosisHumansLeishmania infantum

Identifiers

PMID26152413
OpenAlexW1927478914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.