Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26151906›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Selective CNS Uptake of the GCP-II Inhibitor 2-PMPA following Intranasal Administration.

Rana Rais, Krystyna Wozniak, Ying Wu, Minae Niwa, Marigo Stathis, Jesse Alt, Marc Giroux, Akira Sawa, Camilo Rojas, Barbara S Slusher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Dendrimer-2PMPA Delays Muscle Function Loss and Denervation in a Murine Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rana RaisBrain Science Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Krystyna WozniakBrain Science Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Ying WuBrain Science Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Minae NiwaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Marigo StathisBrain Science Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Jesse AltBrain Science Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Marc GirouxKurve Technology, Inc., Bothell, Washington, United States of America.
Akira SawaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Camilo RojasBrain Science Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America; Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Barbara S SlusherBrain Science Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America; Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USTechnoServe · US

Funding

GCPII Inihibitors for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neuropathyR01CA161056 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SLUSHER, BARBARA STAUCH · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161056NCI NIH HHS R01CA161056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCP-II) is a brain metallopeptidase that hydrolyzes the abundant neuropeptide N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate (NAAG) to NAA and glutamate. Small molecule GCP-II inhibitors increase brain NAAG, which activates mGluR3, decreases glutamate, and provide therapeutic utility in a variety of preclinical models of neurodegenerative diseases wherein excess glutamate is presumed pathogenic. Unfortunately no GCP-II inhibitor has advanced clinically, largely due to their highly polar nature resulting in insufficient oral bioavailability and limited brain penetration. Herein we report a non-invasive route for delivery of GCP-II inhibitors to the brain via intranasal (i.n.) administration. Three structurally distinct classes of GCP-II inhibitors were evaluated including DCMC (urea-based), 2-MPPA (thiol-based) and 2-PMPA (phosphonate-based). While all showed some brain penetration following i.n. administration, 2-PMPA exhibited the highest levels and was chosen for further evaluation. Compared to intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration, equivalent doses of i.n. administered 2-PMPA resulted in similar plasma exposures (AUC0-t, i.n./AUC0-t, i.p. = 1.0) but dramatically enhanced brain exposures in the olfactory bulb (AUC0-t, i.n./AUC0-t, i.p. = 67), cortex (AUC0-t, i.n./AUC0-t, i.p. = 46) and cerebellum (AUC0-t, i.n./AUC0-t, i.p. = 6.3). Following i.n. administration, the brain tissue to plasma ratio based on AUC0-t in the olfactory bulb, cortex, and cerebellum were 1.49, 0.71 and 0.10, respectively, compared to an i.p. brain tissue to plasma ratio of less than 0.02 in all areas. Furthermore, i.n. administration of 2-PMPA resulted in complete inhibition of brain GCP-II enzymatic activity ex-vivo confirming target engagement. Lastly, because the rodent nasal system is not similar to humans, we evaluated i.n. 2-PMPA also in a non-human primate. We report that i.n. 2-PMPA provides selective brain delivery with micromolar concentrations. These studies support intranasal delivery of 2-PMPA to deliver therapeutic concentrations in the brain and may facilitate its clinical development.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnimalsArea Under CurveCentral Nervous SystemCerebellar CortexChromatography, High Pressure LiquidGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIGlutaratesHalf-LifeInjections, IntraperitonealMacaca fascicularisMaleOlfactory BulbOrganophosphorus CompoundsRatsRats, Wistar2-(3-mercaptopropyl)pentanedioic acid2-(phosphonomethyl)pentanedioic acidGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIGlutaratesOrganophosphorus CompoundsSulfhydryl Compounds

Identifiers

PMID26151906
PMCPMC4494705
OpenAlexW1520754465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.