Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26151864›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Patient Experience Shows Little Relationship with Hospital Quality Management Strategies.

Oliver Groene, Onyebuchi A Arah, Niek S Klazinga, Cordula Wagner, Paul D Bartels, Solvejg Kristensen, Florence Saillour, Andrew Thompson, Caroline A Thompson, Holger Pfaff and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Improving Patient Experience in Healthcare.Journal of Brown hospital medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Evolving Trends in Safe Surgery in Otolaryngology: Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Oliver GroeneDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Red de investigación en servicios de salud en enfermedades crónicas REDISSEC, Barcelona, Spain.
Onyebuchi A ArahDepartment of Epidemiology, The Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Niek S KlazingaAcademic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cordula WagnerNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Paul D BartelsDanish Clinical Registries, Aarhus, Denmark, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Solvejg KristensenDanish Clinical Registries, Aarhus, Denmark, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Florence SaillourUnité Méthodes Evaluation en Santé, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Andrew ThompsonSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Caroline A ThompsonPalo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute (PAMFRI), Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Holger PfaffInstitute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Maral DerSarkissianDepartment of Epidemiology, The Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Rosa SunolAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Red de investigación en servicios de salud en enfermedades crónicas REDISSEC, Barcelona, Spain.
Aalborg University · DKUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USAcademic Medical Center · NLCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLPalo Alto Institute · USUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatient-reported experience measures are increasingly being used to routinely monitor the quality of care. With the increasing attention on such measures, hospital managers seek ways to systematically improve patient experience across hospital departments, in particular where outcomes are used for public reporting or reimbursement. However, it is currently unclear whether hospitals with more mature quality management systems or stronger focus on patient involvement and patient-centered care strategies perform better on patient-reported experience. We assessed the effect of such strategies on a range of patient-reported experience measures. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe employed a cross-sectional, multi-level study design randomly recruiting hospitals from the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey between May 2011 and January 2012. Each hospital contributed patient level data for four conditions/pathways: acute myocardial infarction, stroke, hip fracture and deliveries. The outcome variables in this study were a set of patient-reported experience measures including a generic 6-item measure of patient experience (NORPEQ), a 3-item measure of patient-perceived discharge preparation (Health Care Transition Measure) and two single item measures of perceived involvement in care and hospital recommendation. Predictor variables included three hospital management strategies: maturity of the hospital quality management system, patient involvement in quality management functions and patient-centered care strategies. We used directed acyclic graphs to detail and guide the modeling of the complex relationships between predictor variables and outcome variables, and fitted multivariable linear mixed models with random intercept by hospital, and adjusted for fixed effects at the country level, hospital level and patient level.

resultsOverall, 74 hospitals and 276 hospital departments contributed data on 6,536 patients to this study (acute myocardial infarction n = 1,379, hip fracture n = 1,503, deliveries n = 2,088, stroke n = 1,566). Patients admitted for hip fracture and stroke had the lowest scores across the four patient-reported experience measures throughout. Patients admitted after acute myocardial infarction reported highest scores on patient experience and hospital recommendation; women after delivery reported highest scores for patient involvement and health care transition. We found no substantial associations between hospital-wide quality management strategies, patient involvement in quality management, or patient-centered care strategies with any of the patient-reported experience measures.

conclusionThis is the largest study so far to assess the complex relationship between quality management strategies and patient experience with care. Our findings suggest absence of and wide variations in the institutionalization of strategies to engage patients in quality management, or implement strategies to improve patient-centeredness of care. Seemingly counterintuitive inverse associations could be capturing a scenario where hospitals with poorer quality management were beginning to improve their patient experience. The former suggests that patient-centered care is not yet sufficiently integrated in quality management, while the latter warrants a nuanced assessment of the motivation and impact of involving patients in the design and assessment of services.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHip FracturesHospital AdministrationHospitalsHumansMaleMyocardial InfarctionPatient ParticipationPatientsPatient SatisfactionQuality ImprovementStrokeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26151864
PMCPMC4494712
OpenAlexW1958433196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.