Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26151513›Full record

ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2015

Computed tomography-related radiation exposure in children transferred to a Level I pediatric trauma center.

Adam S Brinkman, Kara G Gill, Charles M Leys, Ankush Gosain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Systems-based care of the injured child: Technical report.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam S BrinkmanFrom the Department of Surgery (A.S.B., C.M.L, A.G.), Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Radiology (K.G.G.), Division of Pediatric Radiology, and American Family Children's Hospital (A.G.), Pediatric Trauma Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Kara G Gill
Charles M Leys
Ankush Gosain

Funding

Gastrointestinal Mucosal Immune Defects in Hirschsprungs DiseaseK08DK098271 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GOSAIN, ANKUSH · 2014 to 2018
$815k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK098271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePediatric trauma patients presenting to referring facilities (RF) often undergo computed tomography (CT) scans to identify injuries before transfer to a Level I pediatric trauma center (PTC). The purpose of our study was to evaluate RF compliance with the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines to minimize ionizing radiation exposure in pediatric trauma patients and to determine the frequency of additional or repeat CT imaging after transfer to a PTC.

methodsAfter institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all pediatric trauma admissions from January 2010 to December 2011 at our American College of Surgeons Level I PTC was performed. Patient demographics, means of arrival, Injury Severity Score, and disposition were analyzed. Patients who underwent CT were grouped by means of arrival: those who were transferred from an RF versus those who presented primarily to the PTC. Compliance with ACR guidelines and need for additional or repeat CT scans were assessed for both groups.

resultsSix hundred ninety-seven children (aged <18 years) were identified, with a mean age of 10.6 years. Three hundred twenty-one (46%) patients presented primarily to the PTC. Three hundred seventy-six (54%) were transferred from an RF, of which 90 (24%) patients underwent CT imaging before transfer. CT radiation dosing information was available for 79 (88%) of 90 patients. After transfer, 8 (9%) of 90 of children imaged at an RF required additional CT scans. In comparison, 314 (98%) of 321 patients who presented primarily to the PTC and underwent CT received appropriate pediatric radiation dosing. Mean radiation dose at PTC was approximately half of that at RF for CT scans of the head, chest, and abdomen/pelvis (p < 0.01).

conclusionPediatric trauma patients transferred from RF often undergo CT scanning with higher than recommended radiation doses, potentially placing them at an increased carcinogenic risk. Fortunately, few RF patients required additional CT scans after PTC transfer. Finally, compliance with ACR radiation dose limit guidelines is better achieved at a PTC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management study, level IV.

Indexed as

Referral and ConsultationTomography, X-Ray ComputedTrauma CentersChildFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreMalePatient TransferRadiation DosageRetrospective StudiesWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID26151513
PMCPMC4498275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.