Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26151451›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

GntR Family of Bacterial Transcription Factors and Their DNA Binding Motifs: Structure, Positioning and Co-Evolution.

Inna A Suvorova, Yuri D Korostelev, Mikhail S Gelfand

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Contribution of theMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Genetic disruption of the bacterialProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Inna A SuvorovaResearch and Training Center on Bioinformatics, Institute for Information Transmission Problems RAS (The Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia.
Yuri D KorostelevResearch and Training Center on Bioinformatics, Institute for Information Transmission Problems RAS (The Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail S GelfandResearch and Training Center on Bioinformatics, Institute for Information Transmission Problems RAS (The Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia; Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Institute for Information Transmission Problems · RUBioinformatics Institute · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The GNTR family of transcription factors (TFs) is a large group of proteins present in diverse bacteria and regulating various biological processes. Here we use the comparative genomics approach to reconstruct regulons and identify binding motifs of regulators from three subfamilies of the GNTR family, FADR, HUTC, and YTRA. Using these data, we attempt to predict DNA-protein contacts by analyzing correlations between binding motifs in DNA and amino acid sequences of TFs. We identify pairs of positions with high correlation between amino acids and nucleotides for FADR, HUTC, and YTRA subfamilies and show that the most predicted DNA-protein interactions are quite similar in all subfamilies and conform well to the experimentally identified contacts formed by FadR from E. coli and AraR from B. subtilis. The most frequent predicted contacts in the analyzed subfamilies are Arg-G, Asn-A, Asp-C. We also analyze the divergon structure and preferred site positions relative to regulated genes in the FADR and HUTC subfamilies. A single site in a divergon usually regulates both operons and is approximately in the middle of the intergenic area. Double sites are either involved in the co-operative regulation of both operons and then are in the center of the intergenic area, or each site in the pair independently regulates its own operon and tends to be near it. We also identify additional candidate TF-binding boxes near palindromic binding sites of TFs from the FADR, HUTC, and YTRA subfamilies, which may play role in the binding of additional TF-subunits.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBacillus subtilisBacteriaBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceBinding SitesDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsEvolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialGenomicsMolecular Sequence DataNucleotide MotifsOperonBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsGntR protein, E coliTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26151451
PMCPMC4494728
OpenAlexW768745391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.