Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26151134›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Prediction model for aneuploidy in early human embryo development revealed by single-cell analysis.

Maria Vera-Rodriguez, Shawn L Chavez, Carmen Rubio, Renee A Reijo Pera, Carlos Simon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
25.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chromosomal Instability and Chromoanagenesis as Forces for Genomic Evolution.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Vera-Rodriguez1] Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Reproductive and Stem Cell Biology, Stanford, California 94305, USA. [2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Reproductive and Stem Cell Biology, Stanford, California 94305, USA. [3] IGenomix, Parc Cientific Universitat de Valencia, Catedratico Agustin Escardino 9, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain.
Shawn L Chavez1] Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Reproductive and Stem Cell Biology, Stanford, California 94305, USA. [2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Reproductive and Stem Cell Biology, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Carmen Rubio1] IGenomix, Parc Cientific Universitat de Valencia, Catedratico Agustin Escardino 9, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain. [2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, University of Valencia, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain.
Renee A Reijo Pera1] Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Reproductive and Stem Cell Biology, Stanford, California 94305, USA. [2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Reproductive and Stem Cell Biology, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Carlos Simon1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Reproductive and Stem Cell Biology, Stanford, California 94305, USA. [2] IGenomix, Parc Cientific Universitat de Valencia, Catedratico Agustin Escardino 9, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain. [3] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, University of Valencia, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain.
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USParc Científic de la Universitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aneuploidies are prevalent in the human embryo and impair proper development, leading to cell cycle arrest. Recent advances in imaging and molecular and genetic analyses are postulated as promising strategies to unveil the mechanisms involved in aneuploidy generation. Here we combine time-lapse, complete chromosomal assessment and single-cell RT-qPCR to simultaneously obtain information from all cells that compose a human embryo until the approximately eight-cell stage (n=85). Our data indicate that the chromosomal status of aneuploid embryos (n=26), including those that are mosaic (n=3), correlates with significant differences in the duration of the first mitotic phase when compared with euploid embryos (n=28). Moreover, gene expression profiling suggests that a subset of genes is differentially expressed in aneuploid embryos during the first 30 h of development. Thus, we propose that the chromosomal fate of an embryo is likely determined as early as the pronuclear stage and may be predicted by a 12-gene transcriptomic signature.

Indexed as

AneuploidyModels, BiologicalCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenetic TestingHumans

Identifiers

PMID26151134
PMCPMC4506544
OpenAlexW2255537226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.