Observational studyClinical interventions in aging2015
Geriatrician interventions on medication prescribing for frail older people in residential aged care facilities.
Observational study in Clinical interventions in aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Benzodiazepine, Z-Drug and Melatonin Use in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Australasian journal on ageing · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes of deprescribing for people with life-limiting conditions: A systematic review.Palliative medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes of deprescribing interventions in older patients with life-limiting illness and limited life expectancy: A systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Interventions to Optimise Prescribing in Older People with Dementia: A Systematic Review.Drugs & aging · 2019Pooled it
- Deprescribing in Australian residential aged care facilities: A scoping review.Australasian journal on ageing · 2025Article
- Polypharmacy trajectories among older women with and without dementia: A longitudinal cohort study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2021Article
- Using telehealth to enable collaboration of pharmacists and geriatricians in residential medication management reviews.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019Article
- Evaluation of pharmacist interventions and commonly used medications in the geriatric ward of a teaching hospital in Turkey: a retrospective study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2019Article
- Evaluation of pharmacotherapy complexity in residents of long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional descriptive study.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2017Article
- Impact of pharmacist interventions in older patients: a prospective study in a tertiary hospital in Germany.Clinical interventions in aging · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs), the use of certain classes of high-risk medication such as antipsychotics, potent analgesics, and sedatives is high. Here, we examined the prescribed medications and subsequent changes recommended by geriatricians during comprehensive geriatric consultations provided to residents of RACFs via videoconference.
designThis is a prospective observational study.
settingFour RACFs in Queensland, Australia, are included.
participantsA total of 153 residents referred by general practitioners for comprehensive assessment by geriatricians delivered by video-consultation.
resultsResidents' mean (standard deviation, SD) age was 83.0 (8.1) years and 64.1% were female. They had multiple comorbidities (mean 6), high levels of dependency, and were prescribed a mean (SD) of 9.6 (4.2) regular medications. Ninety-one percent of patients were taking five or more medications daily. Of total medications prescribed (n=1,469), geriatricians recommended withdrawal of 9.8% (n=145) and dose alteration of 3.5% (n=51). New medications were initiated in 47.7% (n=73) patients. Of the 10.3% (n=151) medications considered as high risk, 17.2% were stopped and dose altered in 2.6%.
conclusionThere was a moderate prevalence of potentially inappropriate high-risk medications. However, geriatricians made relatively few changes, suggesting either that, on balance, prescription of these medications was appropriate or, because of other factors, there was a reluctance to adjust medications. A structured medication review using an algorithm for withdrawing medications of high disutility might help optimize medications in frail patients. Further research, including a broader survey, is required to understand these dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.