ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2015
Development of biosimilars in an era of oncologic drug shortages.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biosimilars for the Treatment of Cancer: A Systematic Review of Published Evidence.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2017Pooled it
- Monoclonal Antibody and Fusion Protein Biosimilars Across Therapeutic Areas: A Systematic Review of Published Evidence.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2016Pooled it
- Osteoporosis treatment with biosimilars in Malaysia and Thailand: a budget impact analysis.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Pharmacists' approach to oncology medicine shortages: results of a cross-sectional survey in Pakistan.BMJ open · 2023Article
- The Totality of Evidence and Use of ABP 215, a Biosimilar to Bevacizumab.Oncology and therapy · 2021Article
- Biosimilars as a Future, Promising Solution for Financial Toxicity: A Review with Emphasis on Bevacizumab.Cureus · 2020Review
- The Future of Biosimilars: Maximizing Benefits Across Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.Drugs · 2020Review
- A Phase I, Randomized, Single-Dose Study to Evaluate the Biosimilarity of QL1206 to Denosumab Among Chinese Healthy Subjects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- The Role of Rituximab in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment and the Potential Utility of Biosimilars.The oncologist · 2018Review
- Article
- Biosimilars: Key regulatory considerations and similarity assessment tools.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2017Review
- Bevacizumab in Colorectal Cancer: Current Role in Treatment and the Potential of Biosimilars.Targeted oncology · 2017Review
- Improving Access to Cancer Treatments: The Role of Biosimilars.Journal of global oncology · 2017Article
- The process defines the product: what really matters in biosimilar design and production?Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2017Review
- Rituximab in the treatment of follicular lymphoma: the future of biosimilars in the evolving therapeutic landscape.Cancer management and research · 2017Review
- Time spent by Belgian hospital pharmacists on supply disruptions and drug shortages: An exploratory study.PloS one · 2017Article
- Drug tendering: drug supply and shortage implications for the uptake of biosimilars.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2017Review
- Derivatives (halogen, nitro and amino) of 8-hydroxyquinoline with highly potent antimicrobial and antioxidant activities.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2016Article
- A phase I dose-escalation study of a biosimilar trastuzumab in Chinese metastasis breast cancer patients.SpringerPlus · 2015Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute and chronic shortages of various pharmaceuticals and particularly of sterile injectable products are being reported on a global scale, prompting evaluation of more effective strategies to manage current shortages and development of new, high-quality pharmaceutical products to mitigate the risk of potential future shortages. Oncology drugs such as liposomal doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil represent examples of first-choice drugs critically affected by shortages. Survey results indicate that the majority of hospitals and practicing oncologists have experienced drug shortages, which may have compromised patient safety and clinical outcomes, and increased health care costs, due to delays or changes in treatment regimens. Clinical trials evaluating novel agents in combination with standard-of-care drugs are also being affected by drug shortages. Clinical and ethical considerations on treatment objectives, drug indication, and availability of alternative options may help in prioritizing cancer patients involved in active drug shortages. The United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency have identified manufacturing problems, delays in supply, and lack of available active ingredients as the most frequent causes of recent or ongoing drug shortages, and have released specific guidance to monitor, manage, and reduce the risk of shortages. The upcoming loss of exclusivity for a number of anticancer biologics, together with the introduction of an abbreviated approval pathway for biosimilars, raises the question of whether these products will be vulnerable to shortages. Future supply by reliable manufacturers of well characterized biosimilar monoclonal antibodies, developed in compliance with regulatory and manufacturing guidelines and with substantial investments, may contribute to prevent future biologics shortages and ensure access to effective and safe treatment options for patients with cancer. Preclinical and clinical characterization is ongoing for potential biosimilars of trastuzumab, rituximab, and bevacizumab, with promising results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.