Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26150498›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Rapid and widespread de novo evolution of kin discrimination.

Olaya Rendueles, Peter C Zee, Iris Dinkelacker, Michaela Amherd, Sébastien Wielgoss, Gregory J Velicer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Insights into the genomic and phenotypic characteristics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Self-growth suppression inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mutation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. WildEcology and evolution · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olaya RenduelesInstitute for Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; olaya.rendueles@env.ethz.ch.
Peter C ZeeDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; Department of Biology, California State University-Northridge, Northridge, CA 91330;
Iris DinkelackerDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Max-Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Michaela AmherdInstitute for Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland;
Sébastien WielgossInstitute for Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland;
Gregory J VelicerInstitute for Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; Department of Evolutionary Biology, Max-Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

Comprehensive analysis of evolutionary mutations in a highly social bacteriumR01GM079690 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI VELICER, GREGORY J · 2007 to 2011
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM079690NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diverse forms of kin discrimination, broadly defined as alteration of social behavior as a function of genetic relatedness among interactants, are common among social organisms from microbes to humans. However, the evolutionary origins and causes of kin-discriminatory behavior remain largely obscure. One form of kin discrimination observed in microbes is the failure of genetically distinct colonies to merge freely upon encounter. Here, we first use natural isolates of the highly social bacterium Myxococcus xanthus to show that colony-merger incompatibilities can be strong barriers to social interaction, particularly by reducing chimerism in multicellular fruiting bodies that develop near colony-territory borders. We then use experimental laboratory populations to test hypotheses regarding the evolutionary origins of kin discrimination. We show that the generic process of adaptation, irrespective of selective environment, is sufficient to repeatedly generate kin-discriminatory behaviors between evolved populations and their common ancestor. Further, we find that kin discrimination pervasively evolves indirectly between allopatric replicate populations that adapt to the same ecological habitat and that this occurs generically in many distinct habitats. Patterns of interpopulation discrimination imply that kin discrimination phenotypes evolved via many diverse genetic mechanisms and mutation-accumulation patterns support this inference. Strong incompatibility phenotypes emerged abruptly in some populations but strengthened gradually in others. The indirect evolution of kin discrimination in an asexual microbe is analogous to the indirect evolution of reproductive incompatibility in sexual eukaryotes and linguistic incompatibility among human cultures, the commonality being indirect, noncoordinated divergence of complex systems evolving in isolation.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAdaptation, PhysiologicalChimeraMyxococcus xanthusPhenotypeTime Factorscooperationkin recognitionnonself recognitionsocial evolutionterritoriality

Identifiers

PMID26150498
PMCPMC4517285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.