ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2015
Relationship Between Cancer and Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cancer.International journal of cardiology · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic impact of cancer among patients with acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Pooled it
- Revascularisation in Patients with Cancer: A Review.European cardiology · 2026Review
- Short and long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with active or prior history of cancer: a systematic review andInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Cancer history and mortality risk in acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the Japan AMI registry.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The impact of immune checkpoint inhibition on atherosclerosis in cancer patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Emergent Coronary Thrombectomy for Acute Myocardial Infarction Immediately Following Craniotomy with Tumor Resection.Cardiology and therapy · 2024Article
- Association between Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Another Brick in the Wall.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Prognostic impact of cancer history in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Article
- Comparisons of drug-eluting balloon versus drug-eluting stent for the treatment of cancer patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Screening for Coronary Artery Disease in Cancer Survivors:JACC. CardioOncology · 2023Review
- Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: Modern Approach to a Classic Challenge.Current cardiology reviews · 2023Review
- Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Cancer: Clinical Challenges and Management Strategies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Index Admission and Thirty-Day Readmission Outcomes of Patients With Cancer Presenting With STEMI.Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions · 2022Article
- Impact of contrast-induced acute kidney injury on long-term major adverse cardiovascular events and kidney function after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from a territory-wide cohort study in Hong Kong.Clinical kidney journal · 2022Article
- Coronary Artery Disease and Cancer: Treatment and Prognosis Regarding Gender Differences.Cancers · 2022Review
- In-hospital and one-year outcomes in cancer patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: A real-world study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cancer using bare metal stents compared to drug-eluting stents.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Differing Haemoglobin Levels Undergoing Semi-Urgent and Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in an Asian Population.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease and cancer increasingly coexist, yet relationships between cancer and long-term cardiovascular outcomes post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well studied. METHODS AND
resultsWe examined stented PCI patients at Duke (1996-2010) using linked data from the Duke Information Systems for Cardiovascular Care and the Duke Tumor Registry (a cancer treatment registry). Our primary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes included composite cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization and all-cause mortality. We used adjusted cause-specific hazard models to examine outcomes among cancer patients (cancer treatment pre-PCI) versus controls (no cancer treatment pre-PCI). Cardiovascular mortality was explored in a cancer subgroup with recent (within 1 year pre-PCI) cancer and in post-PCI cancer patients using post-PCI cancer as a time-dependent variable. Among 15 008 patients, 3.3% (n=496) were cancer patients. Observed rates of 14-year cardiovascular mortality (31.4% versus 27.7%, P=0.31) and composite cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization (51.1% versus 55.8%, P=0.37) were similar for cancer versus control groups; all-cause mortality rates were higher (79.7% versus 49.3%, P<0.01). Adjusted risk of cardiovascular mortality was similar for cancer patients versus controls (hazard ratio 0.95; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.20) and for patients with versus without recent cancer (hazard ratio 1.46; 95% CI 0.92 to 2.33). Post-PCI cancer, present in 4.3% (n=647) of patients, was associated with cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.51; 95% CI 1.11 to 2.03).
conclusionsCancer history was present in a minority of PCI patients but was not associated with worse long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Further investigation into PCI outcomes in this population is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.