Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26150420›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2015

Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences.

Neha J Varghese, Supratim Mukherjee, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos T Konstantinidis, Kostas Mavrommatis, Nikos C Kyrpides, Amrita Pati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 360 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
360citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

360 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Draft genome sequences of two bovine-associatedMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DistinguishingmSystems · 2026
    Article
  6. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Complete genomes ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

300 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neha J VargheseMicrobial and Metagenome Superprogram, DOE Joint Genomic Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Supratim MukherjeeMicrobial and Metagenome Superprogram, DOE Joint Genomic Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Natalia IvanovaMicrobial and Metagenome Superprogram, DOE Joint Genomic Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Konstantinos T KonstantinidisDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0355, USA.
Kostas MavrommatisCelgene Corp., San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Nikos C KyrpidesMicrobial and Metagenome Superprogram, DOE Joint Genomic Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA njvarghese@lbl.gov.
Amrita PatiMicrobial and Metagenome Superprogram, DOE Joint Genomic Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA njvarghese@lbl.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased sequencing of microbial genomes has revealed that prevailing prokaryotic species assignments can be inconsistent with whole genome information for a significant number of species. The long-standing need for a systematic and scalable species assignment technique can be met by the genome-wide Average Nucleotide Identity (gANI) metric, which is widely acknowledged as a robust measure of genomic relatedness. In this work, we demonstrate that the combination of gANI and the alignment fraction (AF) between two genomes accurately reflects their genomic relatedness. We introduce an efficient implementation of AF,gANI and discuss its successful application to 86.5M genome pairs between 13,151 prokaryotic genomes assigned to 3032 species. Subsequently, by comparing the genome clusters obtained from complete linkage clustering of these pairs to existing taxonomy, we observed that nearly 18% of all prokaryotic species suffer from anomalies in species definition. Our results can be used to explore central questions such as whether microorganisms form a continuum of genetic diversity or distinct species represented by distinct genetic signatures. We propose that this precise and objective AF,gANI-based species definition: the MiSI (Microbial Species Identifier) method, be used to address previous inconsistencies in species classification and as the primary guide for new taxonomic species assignment, supplemented by the traditional polyphasic approach, as required.

Indexed as

Genome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialAlgorithmsArchaeaBacteriaClassificationCluster AnalysisGenomicsListeria monocytogenesPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID26150420
PMCPMC4538840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.