Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26149977›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2015

Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens.

Anna Wolc, Honghua H Zhao, Jesus Arango, Petek Settar, Janet E Fulton, Neil P O'Sullivan, Rudolf Preisinger, Chris Stricker, David Habier, Rohan L Fernando and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Runs of homozygosity and signatures of selection for number of oocytes and embryos in the Gir Indicine cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna WolcDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011-3150, USA. awolc@iastate.edu.
Honghua H ZhaoDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011-3150, USA. Honghua.Zhao@pioneer.com.
Jesus ArangoHy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA, 50063, USA. JArango@hyline.com.
Petek SettarHy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA, 50063, USA. PSettar@hyline.com.
Janet E FultonHy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA, 50063, USA. JFulton@hyline.com.
Neil P O'SullivanHy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA, 50063, USA. NOSullivan@hyline.com.
Rudolf PreisingerLohmann Tierzucht GmbH, 27472, Cuxhaven, Germany. preisinger@ltz.de.
Chris Strickeragn Genetics GmbH, Börtjistrasse 8b, 7260, Davos, Switzerland. stricker@genetics-network.ch.
David HabierDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011-3150, USA. dhabier@gmail.com.
Rohan L FernandoDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011-3150, USA. rohan@iastate.edu.
Dorian J GarrickDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011-3150, USA. dorian@iastate.edu.
Susan J LamontDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011-3150, USA. sjlamont@iastate.edu.
Jack C M DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011-3150, USA. jdekkers@iastate.edu.
Iowa State University · USHy-Line (United States) · USLohmann Tierzucht (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic selection (GS) using estimated breeding values (GS-EBV) based on dense marker data is a promising approach for genetic improvement. A simulation study was undertaken to illustrate the opportunities offered by GS for designing breeding programs. It consisted of a selection program for a sex-limited trait in layer chickens, which was developed by deterministic predictions under different scenarios. Later, one of the possible schemes was implemented in a real population of layer chicken.

methodsIn the simulation, the aim was to double the response to selection per year by reducing the generation interval by 50 %, while maintaining the same rate of inbreeding per year. We found that GS with retraining could achieve the set objectives while requiring 75 % fewer reared birds and 82 % fewer phenotyped birds per year. A multi-trait GS scenario was subsequently implemented in a real population of brown egg laying hens. The population was split into two sub-lines, one was submitted to conventional phenotypic selection, and one was selected based on genomic prediction. At the end of the 3-year experiment, the two sub-lines were compared for multiple performance traits that are relevant for commercial egg production.

resultsBirds that were selected based on genomic prediction outperformed those that were submitted to conventional selection for most of the 16 traits that were included in the index used for selection. However, although the two programs were designed to achieve the same rate of inbreeding per year, the realized inbreeding per year assessed from pedigree was higher in the genomic selected line than in the conventionally selected line.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate that GS is a promising alternative to conventional breeding for genetic improvement of layer chickens.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAnimalsChickensModels, GeneticPedigreePhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociSelective Breeding

Identifiers

PMID26149977
PMCPMC4492088
OpenAlexW1825860353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.