Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26149711›Full record

ReviewActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2015

Microcirculatory dysfunction and tissue oxygenation in critical illness.

L Østergaard, A Granfeldt, N Secher, A Tietze, N K Iversen, M S Jensen, K K Andersen, K Nagenthiraja, P Gutiérrez-Lizardi, K Mouridsen and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Relevance of Microvascular Flow Assessments in Critically Ill Neonates and Children: A Systematic Review.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

L ØstergaardDepartment of Neuroradiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
A GranfeldtDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
N SecherDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
A TietzeDepartment of Neuroradiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
N K IversenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience and MINDLab, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
M S JensenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience and MINDLab, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
K K AndersenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
K NagenthirajaCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience and MINDLab, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
P Gutiérrez-LizardiFaculty of Dentistry, University of Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.
K MouridsenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience and MINDLab, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
S N JespersenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience and MINDLab, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
E K TønnesenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKUniversity of Monterrey · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe sepsis is defined by organ failure, often of the kidneys, heart, and brain. It has been proposed that inadequate delivery of oxygen, or insufficient extraction of oxygen in tissue, may explain organ failure. Despite adequate maintenance of systemic oxygen delivery in septic patients, their morbidity and mortality remain high. The assumption that tissue oxygenation can be preserved by maintaining its blood supply follows from physiological models that only apply to tissue with uniformly perfused capillaries. In sepsis, the microcirculation is profoundly disturbed, and the blood supply of individual organs may therefore no longer reflect their access to oxygen. We review how capillary flow patterns affect oxygen extraction efficacy in tissue, and how the regulation of tissue blood flow must be adjusted to meet the metabolic needs of the tissue as capillary flows become disturbed as observed in critical illness. Using the brain, heart, and kidney as examples, we discuss whether disturbed capillary flow patterns might explain the apparent mismatch between organ blood flow and organ function in sepsis. Finally, we discuss diagnostic means of detecting capillary flow disturbance in animal models and in critically ill patients, and address therapeutic strategies that might improve tissue oxygenation by modifying capillary flow patterns.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessCapillariesHumansMicrocirculationOxygenRegional Blood FlowSepsisOxygen

Identifiers

PMID26149711
PMCPMC4758388
OpenAlexW1503255269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.