Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26149458›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2015

Epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemistry: new opportunities in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Ryan A Hutchinson, Richard A Adams, Darragh G McArt, Manuel Salto-Tellez, Bharat Jasani, Peter W Hamilton

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Anti-Metastatic Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. HER2Journal of cellular physiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Comparison of Biomarker Assays forClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ryan A HutchinsonCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland, UK. ryan.hutchinson@unimelb.edu.au.
Richard A AdamsInstitute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Institute of Medical Genetics Building, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK. adams.ra3@cardiff.ac.uk.
Darragh G McArtCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland, UK. d.mcart@qub.ac.uk.
Manuel Salto-TellezCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland, UK. m.salto-tellez@qub.ac.uk.
Bharat JasaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan. bharat.jasani@nu.edu.kz.
Peter W HamiltonCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, Northern Ireland, UK. p.hamilton@qub.ac.uk.
Queen's University Belfast · GBCardiff University · GBNazarbayev University · KZUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of cancer is becoming more precise, targeting specific oncogenic drivers with targeted molecular therapies. The epidermal growth factor receptor has been found to be over-expressed in a multitude of solid tumours. Immunohistochemistry is widely used in the fields of diagnostic and personalised medicine to localise and visualise disease specific proteins. To date the clinical utility of epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemistry in determining monoclonal antibody efficacy has remained somewhat inconclusive. The lack of an agreed reproducible scoring criteria for epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemistry has, in various clinical trials yielded conflicting results as to the use of epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemistry assay as a companion diagnostic. This has resulted in this test being removed from the licence for the drug panitumumab and not performed in clinical practice for cetuximab. In this review we explore the reasons behind this with a particular emphasis on colorectal cancer, and to suggest a way of resolving the situation through improving the precision of epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemistry with quantitative image analysis of digitised images complemented with companion molecular morphological techniques such as in situ hybridisation and section based gene mutation analysis.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryNeoplasm MetastasisBiomarkers, TumorErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID26149458
PMCPMC4492076
OpenAlexW1571595367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.