SynthesisHuman resources for health2015
The impact of physician-nurse task shifting in primary care on the course of disease: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Human resources for health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Nurse-led Telehealth Intervention for Rehabilitation (Telerehabilitation) Among Community-Dwelling Patients With Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Nurse-led task-shifting strategies to substitute for mental health specialists in primary care: A systematic review.International journal of nursing practice · 2022Pooled it
- Task shifting in primary care to tackle healthcare worker shortages: An umbrella review.The European journal of general practice · 2021Pooled it
- Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Does task shifting yield cost savings and improve efficiency for health systems? A systematic review of evidence from low-income and middle-income countries.Human resources for health · 2017Pooled it
- Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led care involving education and engagement of patients and a treat-to-target urate-lowering strategy versus usual care for gout: a randomised controlled trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2018Trial
- Construction of an index system for workplace services by family doctors in China: a two-round Delphi study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Task delegation in emerging chronic diseases: Long COVID care as a paradigm - a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Nurse-supported self-monitoring of serum urate by gout patients using a treat-to-target approach: a feasibility study.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
- Are Economic Evaluations of Task Shifting Too Narrow in Focus? A Rapid Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Review
- Changes in location and number of nurse consultations as the supply of general practitioners decreases in primary health care: six-year register-based follow-up cohort study in the city of Vantaa, Finland.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024Article
- Effects of task-shifting from primary care physicians to nurses: an overview of systematic reviews.Human resources for health · 2024Review
- Developing a Global Strategy for strengthening the occupational therapy workforce: a two-phased mixed-methods consultation of country representatives shows the need for clarifying task-sharing strategies.Human resources for health · 2024Article
- It's not the task, it's the shifting exploring physicians' and leaders' perspectives on task shifting in emergency departments in Norway.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Care models for individuals with chronic multimorbidity: lessons for low- and middle-income countries.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Exploring the association between primary care efficiency and health system characteristics across European countries: a two-stage data envelopment analysis.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Perceived adherence and associated barriers to the national atopic dermatitis guideline: A survey among general practitioners.The European journal of general practice · 2023Article
- A situational analysis of human resource and non-communicable diseases management for community health workers in Chengdu, China: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Patterns of GP and nurse independent prescriber prescriptions for antibiotics dispensed in the community in England: a retrospective analysis.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2023Article
- Developing modern primary care nursing in North Macedonia.Primary health care research & development · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysician-nurse task shifting in primary care appeals greatly to health policymakers. It promises to address workforce shortages and demands of high-quality, affordable care in the healthcare systems of many countries. This systematic review was conducted to assess the evidence about physician-nurse task shifting in primary care in relation to the course of disease and nurses' roles.
methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL, up to August 2012, and the reference list of included studies and relevant reviews. All searches were updated in February 2014. We selected and critically appraised published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
resultsTwelve RCTs comprising 22,617 randomized patients conducted mainly in Europe met the inclusion criteria. Nurse-led care was delivered mainly by nurse practitioners following structured protocols and validated instruments in most studies. Twenty-five unique disease-specific measures of the course of disease were reported in the 12 RCTs. While most (84 %) study estimates showed no significant differences between nurse-led care and physician-led care, nurses achieved better outcomes in the secondary prevention of heart disease and a greater positive effect in managing dyspepsia and at lowering cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients. The studies were generally small, of varying follow-up episodes and were at risk of biases. Descriptive details about roles, qualifications or interventions were also incomplete or not reported.
conclusionTrained nurses may have the ability to achieve outcome results that are at least similar to physicians' for managing the course of disease, when following structured protocols and validated instruments. The evidence, however, is limited by a small number of studies reporting a broad range of disease-specific outcomes; low reporting standards of interventions, roles and clinicians' characteristics, skills and qualifications; and the quality of studies. More rigorous studies using validated tools could clarify these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.